Forest Service Reorg - Progress or Politics

Seems like more of a breach of contract issue than having anything to do with the merits of work from home or flexing hours. Admin should probably read the contract they signed before getting their teeth handed to them again and again.
100% correct.

The Agency Management and Union both negotiated the Master Agreement. They both found benefit to remote/telework its why we negotiate with equal numbers of Management and Union officers. Why all the negotiators sign the MA and then the legal staff of the Agency ensure nothing we negotiate is against the law, agency regs, etc.

This was and will be a slam dunk clear through the appeals process.

Telework and remote work will be reinstated to what's in our MA, and that's a good thing for Management, employees, and taxpayer. Just a fact.

There will always be the loud-mouthed contrarians, but everyone at the table sees the benefits of what was negotiated.
 
Not good news to me. Not bad either.

I don't think it's good to be forced to accept people "working" from home. Like many people, I have experienced what "working" from home looks like. Sometimes they work, sometimes not.

In any case, this will probably be overruled, eventually.
So its ok to violate the terms of a contract? Thats the issue here.

Still remember the ridiculous order to go back to work for one of our employees. Most all of his work was in tele meetings and email aa he supervised and worked with people from all corners of the state. So he has to drive a few hours to do the same exact thing he was doing from his home...at greater expense for both him and his employer.
 
It's up to the appeal ruling to decide if it's violating the terms or not. That is, if it is appealed.
The arbitrator already determined the violation as fact.

They can appeal all they want...just a classic case of waste, fraud and abuse. Which, allegedly, the current administration claims they oppose.

I smell rags burning...its their pants on fire.
 
I can't help but run this through two lenses. First is the Private Equity filter: Strip it to bare bones and sell it to parts.
Second is the Office Space movie filter: "We, uh, we fixed the glitch. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it'll just work itself out naturally."
I feel like this is my life every day. Not sure if I’ll have a job for 8 more years until my first day of retirement eligibility if not. Half expect to show up one day and my login won’t work. 🤷🏻‍♀️

DOI largely isn’t eligible for union representation, so I know nothing about that stuff. What I do know is that I’ve volunteered thousands of hours during my career, received numerous awards recognizing efforts above and beyond my regular job title, because that’s what it took to get the job done. But now that folks completely outside my chain of command and with zero understanding of my job or what I do day to day are mandating downgrades to my performance rating based on arbitrary quotas, while asking me to absorb the work of 3 now-departed colleagues, those days are done. Not going above and beyond anymore. It’s not sustainable and there’s no point. They can replace me with some of these kids that need instructions on how to pee outside and can’t drive off pavement. That should go well.
 
They can replace me with some of these kids that need instructions on how to pee outside and can’t drive off pavement. That should go well.

If they work from home, they wouldn’t need to pee outside or drive off pavement. This is a scenario where a remote worker can really thrive.
 
Not good news to me. Not bad either.

I don't think it's good to be forced to accept people "working" from home. Like many people, I have experienced what "working" from home looks like. Sometimes they work, sometimes not.

In any case, this will probably be overruled, eventually.
How?
 
Arbitrations are generally binding legal decisions.
The article someone posted a link to says it can be appealed. More info below only because I wondered not because I'm on a side.

FLRA or Legal Challenges​

  • Either side can file exceptions to arbitration awards, unfair labor practice charges, or negotiability disputes with the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA).
  • Courts can get involved if there are statutory violations.
  • In rare cases, broad executive actions or exclusions from coverage (e.g., certain national security agencies) have been used to try to strip bargaining rights, but these are heavily litigated and often blocked or challenged as unlawful.
 
A work-from-home, union forest service worker… what a time to be alive.
My office for the past 28.5 years has been my house. I work in the woods just about every day, usually gone from my duty station for 5-8 day stretches, and occasionally up to 16-18 days. My work territory is 10 states, I've completed work at somewhere around 3000 remote work locations in 9/10 of those states.

I'm actually in my physical office 1 or 2 days every 2 weeks, at most. Some times maybe one day a month.

It makes about zero sense for me to have a designated office space at a FS facility. I'm considered a hosted employee and have no direct report at the FS office here. My immediate supervisor lives in another State 6-7 hours away. I essentially plug up an office space that could be used by an employee that actually needs it.

As to Union work, thats also negotiated in our MA. As a Union President and FSC legislative co-chairman I can spend 1200ish hours a year doing Union work.

There have been years when I have claimed maybe 20-30 hours a year. Mainly because I have a great working relationship with our Management, meet with leadership on a regular basis and we solve issues at the lowest level. I donate wayyy more hours than I've claimed. I have donated more work hours than I've ever claimed official Union time.

The past 2 years have been a different story due to illegal/punitive and ridiculous actions that have required I spend more time doing Union representational work. Things like violations of our master agreement, reorganization, office assignments, TOS issues, yada yada. I brought NONE of this on, but have to deal with it.

My exec board for my local are the model employees...I expect no less from them. They all are highly decorated employees that bust their asses for public lands. None of them do it for the money, they all are talented and educated enough to make significantly more money elsewhere. I often wonder why in the actual fugg we do it. Hasn't been too worth it for 3 of my coworkers, one that was killed and 2 others badly injured in a plane crash flying into a remote airstrip. The 2 survivors had a great time hiking out to a highway, one with severe burns and a broken back.

So, your snarky/snide comment is as childish as it is offensive.

I doubt you could hack doing the job we do for 30-40+ years like a lot of us have. I'm proud of all of them, our job is demanding, physically challenging, and requires extensive and broad skills. Not very many make the cut...rare birds.
 
The article someone posted a link to says it can be appealed. More info below only because I wondered not because I'm on a side.

FLRA or Legal Challenges​

  • Either side can file exceptions to arbitration awards, unfair labor practice charges, or negotiability disputes with the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA).
  • Courts can get involved if there are statutory violations.
  • In rare cases, broad executive actions or exclusions from coverage (e.g., certain national security agencies) have been used to try to strip bargaining rights, but these are heavily litigated and often blocked or challenged as unlawful.
Oh, you're on a side...the losing one.
 
Back
Top