I caught plenty of big Lakers and bull trout in Flathead Lake in my younger days. They ranged up to forty pounds and anyone who really worked on it could catch at least a couple of 30+ pounders a year. And then what? Even smoked they usually had to be burnt to a crisp to get the stinky oil out of the meat. Pound for pound they are boring to catch. Hardly fight at all until they see the boat. Then they just use their weight on runs. Ever seen one jump? No, of course not. I have never caught a muskie but plenty of big pike. I'm sorry, no comparison. Not even close. A ten pound pike way outclasses a twenty pound laker for fight.
There is something about sportsmen that makes them think bigger is better. Being just over six foot tall, I guess I never had to prove myself being big enough to shoot or catch big things. Note that I didn't toss moose or elk at the top of the list simply because it's a big deal to get a big horned animal or because they supposedly taste the best. For me the challenge of hunting (defined as stalking) is the important ranking factor ... because the challenge provides more meaningful memories. Any idiot can shoot a cape buffalo over a waterhole while sitting on his arse in a blind. Chase one around in the thick bush and that is something quite different. Not easy to get a shot at one when playing the game on their terms and on their home turf. Easy enough to get stomped to death instead. Similarly, for fishing I find the challenge of stalking trout with a fly rod much more rewarding than dragging a minnow around in a boat for a walleye. Mind you, I do both (pretty much zero fly fishing here) but I will always rank waders and fly rod at the top. Yeah, walleye taste great but if that was the ranking factor, I'd just by lobster at the store. Much better eating and probably cheaper.