Many of you who follow our platforms know that my other job, CPA, is heavily number-based. Given that, I spend even more time number crunching western state draw odds in my effort to acquire the 10-12 tags needed for a TV show season.
Here is a video that goHUNT. com posted to their YouTube channel about how the draw odds they publish are way different, and in far greater detail, than the other popular services out there that they mention in this video. The methodology of goHUNT.com is far different than "simplified first choice odds" most other services provide.
I subscribe to three of the four services mentioned in the video and subscribed to one of the others mention for a decade before eventually dropping that error-prone service. The reason I subscribe to so many services is that I want to see where other people are being directed by information or suggestions provided by those other services; either because of overly simplified (read incorrect) odds being published and/or because the group is also a booking agency and the units where good outfitter relationships exists happen to be units that get promoted heavily. The odds I use for my actual application strategy are those from goHUNT.
In the investing world my strategy would get me labeled as a "contrarian." Yes, I am a contrarian who wants the best information I can find. The best odds I can find are with goHUNT.
Here is their video explaining the differences in the HYPERGEOMETRIC WALLENIUS DISTRIBUTION MODEL used by goHUNT and the simplified methods of others mentioned in the video.
[video=youtube_share;ScgDlvT4Axs]https://youtu.be/ScgDlvT4Axs[/video]
Not sure their production style will make it on the comedy circuit, but I think that Ben Stoner could be a stand in for Red Green's nephew Harold, if Ben would put on some weight, get an overbite, and grease his hair.
Here is a video that goHUNT. com posted to their YouTube channel about how the draw odds they publish are way different, and in far greater detail, than the other popular services out there that they mention in this video. The methodology of goHUNT.com is far different than "simplified first choice odds" most other services provide.
I subscribe to three of the four services mentioned in the video and subscribed to one of the others mention for a decade before eventually dropping that error-prone service. The reason I subscribe to so many services is that I want to see where other people are being directed by information or suggestions provided by those other services; either because of overly simplified (read incorrect) odds being published and/or because the group is also a booking agency and the units where good outfitter relationships exists happen to be units that get promoted heavily. The odds I use for my actual application strategy are those from goHUNT.
In the investing world my strategy would get me labeled as a "contrarian." Yes, I am a contrarian who wants the best information I can find. The best odds I can find are with goHUNT.
Here is their video explaining the differences in the HYPERGEOMETRIC WALLENIUS DISTRIBUTION MODEL used by goHUNT and the simplified methods of others mentioned in the video.
[video=youtube_share;ScgDlvT4Axs]https://youtu.be/ScgDlvT4Axs[/video]
Not sure their production style will make it on the comedy circuit, but I think that Ben Stoner could be a stand in for Red Green's nephew Harold, if Ben would put on some weight, get an overbite, and grease his hair.