Get whatcha pay for.
The HOC response is an opinion in a conversation about hunting, no different than Matt Rinella's. People may disagree with HOCs perspective, but that perspective exists.
I took your comment to be, "I avoided listening to that opinion" not sure what I'm supposed to do with that, you are certainly allowed to disagree, kinda hard to respond to I just didn't like it so I stopped reading.
I mean that's how I felt about Sound and the Fury... certainly not going to try and engage harley about a book I didn't read.
I get your point 100%.
I didn’t stop reading though. I read it all the way through, twice.
I have no issue with them voicing their opinion. No issue whatsoever.
What I took issue with is it went straight for the “ white privilege talking point
I fully accept that white privilege is a thing. But to listen to some folks tell it everything I have is due to my white privilege. All my experiences are due to my white privilege.
I am sorry I don’t buy it.
Tell my Jewish and Native American ancestors about their privilege. Tell my single mom with two kids who pulled herself and us out of poverty by sheer will about her white privilege. Tell my dirt poor grandparents who plowed a living out of the fields and hunted, fished, and trapped to help them survive how privileged they were to have the pleasure.
I guess what I an getting at is HOC pouncing on Meateater for an opinion that had absolutely nothing about race rubbed me the wrong way.
I am all for finding ways to help make sure that the privilege of enjoying the outdoors in our modern times is extended to as many people as possible, no matter what their ethnicity. I don’t see how that is possible as long as, and I paraphrase from the article, “ but don’t ask a person of color how they see the world, let them tell you if they wish”.
Horse hockey.