First of all some of the SE general units do have designated wilderness areas. I probably kill 60% of my general elk in designated wilderness, or within rock throwing distance of them.
I agree with others that the law sucks, but its not an argument about hunters "sticking together". Its about outfitters wanting to line their pockets, period. Wyoming residents didn't pass the law, it was the outfitters and guides association, place the blame where it belongs.
What this issue brings up though, is the ridiculous idea that all hunters must "stick together" on every issue. That's just ignorant talk and I don't care if it comes from David Allen or anyone else. There are many issues that impact hunters differently and because of that, there is going to be internal bickering. I don't have a problem with that bickering either.
As much as I dislike the Wilderness law, there is no doubt that many Residents feel differently. I fully understand why many like the guide requirement in designated wilderness, as it gives residents some relief from the orange army every year.
I think NR's need to realize that the law has been in place for a long time and making the ask of Residents to repeal it is a big ask. In particular when repealing the law will mean increased pressure and crowding in areas that Residents currently hunt. It would be about like punching an ATV road into their favorite hunting spots.
There really isn't much upside to a Resident wanting to repeal this law, unless you're like me and have a basic dislike for the outfitting industry stifling NR hunting as well as limiting NR access to public lands. Just be aware that my position on this law is very different than most R hunters.
Sorry for the hijack.