Forkyfinder
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
- Messages
- 5,062
Except theyd have tolerance for elk numbers.Then they become just like every other private land owner in the area.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except theyd have tolerance for elk numbers.Then they become just like every other private land owner in the area.
That is doubtful, as AP has invested in extensive camping, nature trails, educational programs for the public, flora and fauna research programs, and much more. Too much development and even hardscape for the public to just abandon.Then they become just like every other private land owner in the area.
Kinda think he meant you were never gonna have access anyways so what’s the big deal. Should appreciate what they are doing nowThat is doubtful, as AP has invested in extensive camping, nature trails, educational programs for the public, flora and fauna research programs, and much more. Too much development and even hardscape for the public to just abandon.
Skepticism is okay, but recognition of factual information and considering higher motives is actually more positive.
Must be human nature, but I'll never understand why negativity and criticism is so easy for so many, even in the face of good things to admire and applaud.
It suprises me that some naysayers here don't criticize and conjure up nefarious potential motives of ranchers who sign up for Block Management, saying, "They're gonna eventually pull the BM and not let me hunt. They are just like every other private land owner in the area!"
dailymontanan.com
Thanks for disclosing your true colors.UPOM has made asses of themselves by opposing a non-profit group's effort to help private landowners maximize their property rights. Seems the highest level elected officials of Montana now seem concerned that they missed the "Hypocrisy train."
All aboard. I'm thankful I had to delay my podcast with them until mid-November. Adding this little stunt of "performative politics" will make the episode even better content.
To my knowledge, and googling abilities, there has never been a confirmed case of brucellosis in cattle from wild bison. In or around 1900 Texas an and m researchers showed that it was possible.Apr has 900 bison - has there been a single case of transmission of brucellosis to cattle in the area?
Im missing it? Seems like the colors i expected.Thanks for disclosing your true colors.
Do You truly lack the cognitive ability to see UPOMs hypocrisy? It’s not about true colors. It’s reality.Thanks for disclosing your true colors.
Bison are classified as livestock in MontanaThe Apr bison are not “wild” so I’m guessing they fall under the ag department and are routinely given shots and tested?
FYI, all bison in Montana, wild or not are classified as "livestock" and fall under oversight of the Montana Department of Livestock.The Apr bison are not “wild” so I’m guessing they fall under the ag department and are routinely given shots and tested?
Even the ones on reservation land?Bison are classified as livestock in Montana
Now that I you say that even about wild bison being livestock i think I recall that from maybe when someone on here recapped a bison hunt? None the less, the argument that wild bison transmit brucellosis should be mute.FYI, all bison in Montana, wild or not are classified as "livestock" and fall under oversight of the Montana Department of Livestock.
Those on ranches are tested and vaccinated.
Essentially, the only ones potentially carrying brucellosis are Yellowstone Park bison.
I don't understand what you are saying.Now that I you say that even about wild bison being livestock i think I recall that from maybe when someone on here recapped a bison hunt? None the less, the argument that wild bison transmit brucellosis should be mute.