he is by no means a hunter and i don't like the media referring to him as one of us. he is nothing more than a useless poacher who got caught trespassing on private property. and since the first 2 hunters were shot in the back i find it hard to believe he can even consider self-defense as...
thanks guys, have no intention of using that term or any other term that i do not know the meaning of that may offend people. i was just curious since i have never heard it in this area before. i don't even know if those programs are in effect in my area. but all the same, thank you for the info.
this may sound stupid, but i have heard the term " welfare rancher" alot but do not know what it means. i have never heard it from anyone in my area only on this BB and pertaining to the west coast. what is it? :confused: :confused:
not just no, but " HELL NO", why give criminals licenses. if your not legal then you are a criminal for being here. besides they can't read or understand our traffic laws. |oo |oo |oo :MAD :MAD :MAD
i just hope he didn't re-produce. do you think at any time the phrase " this might not be a good idea" ever crossed his mind????? :confused: :confused: |oo |oo |oo
in certain counties you can hunt with a rifle and that was one of these counties. how can this killer claim self-defense when he shot the first two hunters in the back?? i have absolutely no respect for poachers and trespassers and they should be shot on site.
hem, you forgot to mention the fact that this great upstanding hmong killer was poaching and trespassing. he had a mn. tag not wis. and you don't just wander onto 4oo acres of private property that is clearly posted. we have nothing but trouble with the hmong because they don't care about...
hey guys, paws made a great comeback to the NAHC site also, after all the trashing he did about that site then he goes scurrying back there. just thought i'd let you know.