220yotekiller
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2017
- Messages
- 773
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sorry- what?Not to far off of the possibilities for American Prairie.
I'm sorry- what?
And they still graze their lands. Not saying things can't change, but AP is not what this guy is proposing.It’s pretty much basically the same except for AP is buying from willing sellers….![]()
What do you mean by this? Please expand how Federal taking of land is "not to far off" from what American Prairie is doing. At face value your statement doesn't make sense..ie) childish gibberish.Not to far off of the possibilities for American Prairie.
His is the same old tired argument people like to shout from the rooftops but then retreat to the basement when asked to defend their stance.What do you mean by this? Please expand how Federal taking of land is "not to far off" from what American Prairie is doing. At face value your statement doesn't make sense..ie) childish gibberish.
What AP is doing is just maybe slightly different than the federal government using eminent domain to seize private property...Not to far off of the possibilities for American Prairie.
Paraphrasing and merging his points but basically… “use eminent domain so wolves can live in peace and happiness.”
The title of this thread is on point.
Fooled me.Not to far off of the possibilities for American Prairie.
I’m surprised he didn’t start quoting the 14th Amendment in support of the notion that everyone respect the wolves’ “privacy”. Missed a real opportunity there to establish constitutional rights for all animals. Maybe next time.