What is acceptable accuracy in your opinion

My rifle is better than me. It was a 1.5” group at 200 last time at the range, but that was front and back rests, on a table with a chair. The gun is more than acceptable.

I would ethically struggle with choosing a 2 MOA rifle for western hunting, but would (and have) used slug guns with bigger groups than that in Illinois. Just limit the max range to the capability of the weapon + shooter.

I’ve shot deer freehand at 115 (muzzleloader) and closer when I have time and a good target, but I have completely missed animals at 200 yards and closer in the past, even with a good rest. Luckily haven’t done that in a while, but it is an example of how things can go wrong.

Essentially, I won’t hunt deer past a range where I can’t hit within a 4” circle every single shot. If that range exceeds the lethal range of the weapon, then I go for the lesser range.

My .308 is only about a 350 yard gun with the copper ammo. I hunt to 300. I would shoot an elk farther with my bow than I would a whitetail due to how much they can move at the shot. It’s all situational, but for a rifle? I’m happy with MOA accuracy.
 
If i can reliably put three bullets in a 3" circle at 200 yds at the range I'm hunting.
Seems to work just fine. But 99% of my kill shots max at 300.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
117,523
Messages
2,159,610
Members
38,255
Latest member
41rem
Back
Top