Valid concern or paranoia?

Here's the thing, recent statistical study showed Flock has not reduced crime whatsoever. Their claims are based upon crime rate that is ALREADY dropping under this Administration. They are using data that is generated by better police work without surveillance cameras. Hell, more concealed carry.
 
What if a day after you breakup with a girlfriend, you are innocently driving past her house on the way to grab a bagel at Einsteins while something horrible is happing inside of her home, a home full of your fingerprints and DNA. Flock camera gets a pic of your car on her street at the same time a crime is being committed against your ex, now instead of a misdemeanor for buying shitty bagels, you're facing a felony murder charge. Point being you can be completely innocent and have these images used against you, the thought that if you're doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about doesn't hold water.
 
This ^^^^ scenario has ALREADY played out. Also Erroneous stolen vehicle pull overs, handcuffed for hours until whoops, our bad.

Thomas Massie KY Rep is sponsoring a bill to withhold Federal funding from Cities that engage surveillance type cameras.

🙏
 
What if a day after you breakup with a girlfriend, you are innocently driving past her house on the way to grab a bagel at Einsteins while something horrible is happing inside of her home, a home full of your fingerprints and DNA. Flock camera gets a pic of your car on her street at the same time a crime is being committed against your ex, now instead of a misdemeanor for buying shitty bagels, you're facing a felony murder charge. Point being you can be completely innocent and have these images used against you, the thought that if you're doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about doesn't hold water.
The real world is scary enough. I let God deal with all the hypotheticals.
 
Airguns and spray paint come to mind here.

I drive old cars, leave my cell phone at home, and mostly drive dirt roads.

Im supprised no one else was ever worried about all of the camera that have been along the interstates for over a decade.
Make flat black tail gates and front grills a fad.
 
The real world is scary enough. I let God deal with all the hypotheticals.
The scarier part this is no longer hypothetical. Citizens have been arrested based upon travel near crime scenes due to their "activity" in the area. Time to sue the bejesus out of Flock owner, communities and PD's.
 
The scarier part this is no longer hypothetical. Citizens have been arrested based upon travel near crime scenes due to their "activity" in the area. Time to sue the bejesus out of Flock owner, communities and PD's.
I'm right behind you. Show me what you want to do.

Don't tell me what I should do.
 
I'm right behind you. Show me what you want to do.

Don't tell me what I should do.
Write to your congressional representatives, attend community meetings, speak with data, express Constitutional concerns. Also ask if they established an increased legal budget for legal actions. Don't stay quiet.

IMG_3783.jpeg
 
Meh, just another in the long laundry list of freedoms we have given to the wannabe dictator. Guess it's just different when your ox is gored.

Voting has consequences and we deserve the government we elect.

#evenmorewinning.
 
It's stretching the truth to say this is about one party or one person taking rights away. We saw during Covid that most politicians were perfectly willing to take our rights. Of course, now, even those whose brains didn't work during that time can read that those in charge were simply making things up for their benefits. It appears it was all about money in their pockets.

It seems flock is the same way. I bet if you follow the money, we'll find that someone in the cities/counties/stores that are putting them up have a kickback to them or someone they know. Of course, Flock isn't worried about our rights ... they just want a paycheck. It's not bad that they want a paycheck, but our govts should make this a bit harder.
 
There are perceived rights and there are Constitutionally derived rights. When carping about rights being infringed upon, it is incumbent on the me or whoever to explain those rights.
If Constitutional rights are the concern, it is responsible to cite the language and how it has been interpreted by authority.
Unfortunately there is too much complaining about rights being "taken away", when those rights are merely the personally opinionated complaints about some perceived inconvenience or oversight of actions in the public arena.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
119,726
Messages
2,236,316
Members
38,991
Latest member
bobfreeman10
Back
Top