USPS pension has a $120B unfunded liability. That is why they "lose" money.
Exactly. The only pension required by law to be funded by revenues the agency produces. It occurred in a series of laws, each adding more burden to the USPS, and NONE OF them required of ANY OTHER government agency. For others, the US Treasury covers the obligations the USPS is required to fund themselves.
Again, a political choice, for political reasons. Sure doesn't help their bottom line and is far from normal.
This can easily be changed by the current administration--as could have others before it--advocating for the change back to the norm.
I wouldn't hold your breath. Doesn't fit the political goal.
Last I knew (someone can correct me) USPS employees also pay a lot more out of their pocket to fund their own pension than any other government employee has to. 20 percent or so I seem to recall--so asking that to go up isn't reasonable and probably would further harm recruitment to the job.
Another important isssue is that it is a SERVICE that the country has committed to providing, not a business. UPS and FedEx and others are free to choose--and often do--who they do NOT serve.
The post office doesn't have that luxury and the simple fact is delivering mail to many rural areas in the country is a money loser. Just the way it is, cannot fix that.
It really shows up when USPS tries to close a rural post office. People don't care whether they are red or blue then--they come out with pitchforks in a hurry.