Tikka shooters- Mount the scope to the factory dovetail, or add a picatinny rail?

I understand that having quality rings is good in this situation, but what exactly do those scope brands provide in this scenario that Leupold, Vortex, or other common scope manufacturers don't? (for the record, I am in fact mounting a NF)
Two things here - some scopes have thicker/more robust main tubes that allow increased ring torque. Not all brands or even models within a brand are created equal.

Separately, and independent of main tube thickness, is the demonstrated ability of those scopes to actually hold zero after repeated drops and even just riding in the back of vehicles. Sadly, Leupold and Vortex and MOST other scopes don't tend to hold zero. I think these viral drop tests are causing the industry to take notice and my hope is that one day most manufacturers will produce scopes that reliably track and hold zero in hunting conditions.

Queue the gold ring fanboy backlash :whistle:
 
UM Rings are bulky. SWFA turrets are massive. That's especially my complaint about UM rings. I'm not sure either will stay on the rifle when I get a new barrel spun on.
View attachment 400559
They’re very good scopes, but I agree with the turrets. Way too bulky for what I prefer in a hunting rifle. I know there’s many who disagree, and that’s fine too.

I do like the rings even if they are a little bulky, especially the 1” micro height.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
118,273
Messages
2,187,441
Members
38,502
Latest member
Sga231
Back
Top