Relax, Everything is Going to be Okay!

You are assuming someone is checking. I think that’s a big assumption.

Do you know who got called to question why their signature changes? I don’t. The signature of most people changes.

But also, CC machines ask for a signature and yet, you can just scribble and get by that check. Yet, they still “require” a signature.

Happens all the time in Oregon. If a signature doesn't match it gets bumped and there is a window for the voter to cure it.
 
Not my state, but thanks for playing.

The bigger point is that there is nothing to prevent it from happening if the voting is anonymous.

Fwiw, there is nothing to encourage govt officials to admit they are doing it wrong. But, maybe you trust all govt officials. If so, I guess you trust the ones in DC as well. :D
So you were claiming election fraud in a state other than your own before checking to see how the process in that state works to avoid the fraud you spoke of?
 
That is what they have admitted to at this point I am sure everything is copacetic. Same reason Chuck Schumer is yelling Jim Crow 2.0 from the roof tops
 
Who do you trust for your information? Fair not to trust govt officials.
I gather information from multiple sources and then, verify. It's similar to the old adage ... trust but verify.

Sources/people mostly mean well but aren't always telling the complete truth. That's why verify is important. Most information is partly true but has a bias.
 
So you were claiming election fraud in a state other than your own before checking to see how the process in that state works to avoid the fraud you spoke of?
I listed facts. You posted what the official process is supposed to be.

Ok if you believe that govt workers always follow process. Most of us know that isn't true.
 
I gather information from multiple sources and then, verify. It's similar to the old adage ... trust but verify.

Sources/people mostly mean well but aren't always telling the complete truth. That's why verify is important. Most information is partly true but has a bias.

Well of course, I'm in full agreement here. Multiple sources to find original accounts, first person accounts, multiple video angles. Mostly curious if you had a bias free source you were willing to share.
 
We really don't know how many noncitizens are voting, and we also don't know how many people voted in multiple states. We currently have no way to figure it out.

I know that multiple ballots were sent to houses when the people had moved to another state already. There really wasn't any way to prevent someone from filling the ballot out and returning them.

I do know with certainty that at least one person working at one WA Licensing location encouraged noncitizens to register to vote almost 25 years ago. How many noncitizens were registered?

You are welcome to think it doesn't matter, but there are many elections that are won or lost by less than one percent. It doesn't take much to change an election.
If you’re claiming these are facts without sources, can you please list what credible sources you are citing.
 
Mostly curious if you had a bias free source you were willing to share.
Fwiw, I find X to be pretty good since people can dispute the content via X community notes. People/politicians can post whatever outlandish statement they want. If you wait a bit, someone will correct false statements. But, some of the crazy stuff turns out to be true.
 
Frankly, that's a non-serious request. As soon as I did, you'd say they aren't credible. ;)
Not necessarily. I’m genuinely curious.

I have a journalism degree, the photography side though.

There is an actual Journalism Code of Ethics. I do think it’s been rapidly eroded in the past 15 years or so. But more do to with the proliferation of 24 hour “op ed” news programs that parade as journalists; CNN, MSNBC, FOX.

Most credible “main stream” news sources, whether left, right, or non partisan can’t just frequently populate lies and conspiracy theories without being reprimanded.

I will disagree with you that X and other SM sites are a valid place to get news. There are absolutely ZERO guardrails for what people can post. I do agree that it can be a place for discussion though. But not a place to receive legitimate news. (FYI I’ve not had Facebook for 15 years and never been on twitter, etc.)
 
Back
Top