Seems to me that most of the noise is coming from the Beatty camp. First and foremost one must remember that Pope and Young is a club with a charter and bylaws. It publishes a record book and can set its standards for entry any way it chooses(or votes to). We all seem to agree, that deer is one hell of a buck. Whether or not it qualifies for P&Y is irrelevant. Unless entry is more for the glory of the hunter than the deer.
Personally I think archery hunting has gotten a bit carried away insofar as technological advances. We're talking about a form of hunting that was reintroduced specifically by hunters who wanted to up the effort ante and challenge by taking away the range and easy accuracy of rifles. Virtually every single "advance" in archery since the advent of the compound has been geared towards making bowhunting easier and not necessarily more enriching or rewarding as an experience. Organizations like Buckmasters, IMO, "talks the talk" when it comes to the challenge of the hunt and respecting your quarry etc. but when you catch one of their episodes on TNN you realize that the challenge is more about not tripping over the 4-wheeler, than the hunt itself. What they actually show on the tube says to me that if you don't have the newest junk on the market and didn't kill a "Book Buck" then your hunt failed. I don't buy that for a minute.
Gentlemen, we hang too much crap on our bows as it is. If not for clubs such as P&Y imposing some form of restraint, our bows would have frickin' heatseeking missiles on them.
This argument is all about the AMO. If animals killed with the latest and greatest from the archery industry are not eligible for entry that kills the vast majority of their marketing strategy.
Granted, I havent been keeping up to speed on whats out there but...when was the last time a major bow maker introduced a bow specifically for finger shooters?