NM Federal Land Transfer!

Benfromalbuquerque

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
2,006


The horror of Federal land transfer proposals is in New Mexico. This proposal is not to the State, rather to one Pueblo. Despite the standing 23 year-old Congressional legislation, Sandia Pueblo has curried favor with the outgoing Governor. God willing this will stop when this State administration departs. It’s being sold as “better land management” due to the “vandalism” that’s come from reduced Federal budgeting. The trails mentioned in this article are treasured by myself and thousands of other Burqueans. I was on the Piedra Lisa at sunrise with my young son just this past week! There is no vandalism like excessive litter or graffiti and people making trail is a constant problem everywhere. The law enforcement presence of Pueblo cops will not put boots in the woods or change from what they do best: radar on Tramway road. Mendacious at its core and just as unbelievable as fixing the housing crisis.
 
I could see both sides of this for sure. On one hand this could recuce land that hunting licenses are sold on to the public. Maybe a use easement would be appropriate here to prevent this. On the other hand, federal land has a way of really getting trashed in a bad way. Low bide for mining, invasive bovine grazing. If they are looking for revenue or to not manage land, who knows what they might stoop too. Could be solar pannels or windmills next.

On the other hand, i would suspect if it is absorbed by the reservation that will be the end of public hunting at some point. Now this is not to say thats a bad thing. The Eastern Shoshone people and the Northern Arapahoe people agreed to make a 187,000 acre section of roadless high country 26 years before the us government made the first wilderness area. I know people who hunt that annually and the animals they send me pictures of make the ones on the tv shows look small. they even have a steady population of wolverines, which were thought to be extinct in Wyoming.

So that brings up the point of less people hunting prime animal habitat helps preserve quality genetics, and rare species. Even if we cant hunt that exact spot it could still help the populations on neighboring public lands.
 
My thoughts on this are aligned with OP's here. It seems like a land-grab dressed up to be more palatable to the average citizen. Kind of like a caramel covered onion posing as a candied apple...
They talk a good line about how hunting and recreation access will be preserved for the general public, but there's no way that access continues as it is right now. And there is no way to guarantee that into the future. Once they get control of the land, they get to make the decisions. And if "vandalism" is a problem now I believe it will both continue and be used as a reason to eventually exclude the public all together in the name of preserving the land.
I just fail to see many upsides to this deal at all.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
119,645
Messages
2,233,336
Members
38,961
Latest member
EthanLockwood
Back
Top