With the demand, it is interesting to think what Montana will do with prices. As a NRN, I get them half off and don’t have to be in the draw. I also have what most would consider decent spots from 28 years of living there. At that price, a deer tag still isn’t worth it for me.
In my opinion, NR big game combo prices as is, are way out of line for the average guy with no honey hole and a week to hunt. Obviously demand says otherwise. Would be interesting to see how many they’d sell another year with a 20% increase in price and an economy that isn’t going crazy.
I think a lot of people are just unaware how bad the hunting is getting in Montana on public land. Like one friend told me when talking to a guy that started hunting last year and hunted most the season without seeing an elk. My friend said, "that doesn't surprise me, the hunting has gone to chit in Montana"...the guy's reply was, "well, I guess its better than nothing".
Yeah, I guess taking your rifle for a hike for 5 weeks is better than not hunting at all.
I agree with your assessment that the price being charged for the NR deer and elk tags is out of line for the lack of quality and experience these days. That wasn't the case when I was paying $650ish for a combo tag in the early 2000's, was worth the investment when the hunting was still good and even then, I thought $650 for the deer/elk combo was the upper end of the price point.
The elk hunting, in particular has gotten so poor on public land, I quit buying the elk tag. I could add it for an additional $200 upgrade on the NRN deer combo. Even an additional $200 isn't worth it, IMO. If not for my family living in Montana, I wouldn't even buy the half price NRN deer combo either. The deer hunting is quickly turning into the same pile of chit as the elk hunting, at least on public land.
Like you, it shocks me that the average NR is willing to shell out the crazy prices of the combo tags, for the kind of hunting Montana has.