mevertsen
Well-known member
Remember, hunters are the first conservationists.
But many are calling for the eradication of all predators, native predators.
Doesn't sound very conservationist to me.
What does that mean?
Where does it end?
Why do we need to have more deer and less of others?
Why is it bad to see a coyote or lion.
I'll start.
On lands in Nevada...
Get rid of
Feral horses
Chukar
Huns
Snowcock
Mountain goats
All other introduced and non-native game species.
Allow for a balance of all native species, to include mule deer, elk, pronghorn, sheep coyotes, lions, bobcats and all other native species that were likely here before white man got here.
Im also not one that needs to kill a deer every year.
I also recognize whatever level we had at whatever time we look at, we won't likely have again. We have the here and now.
In regards to predators, we need a lid on them, but calling for the elimination of a species just makes us hunters look like bafoons.
We also have a limit of how many deer can survive and thrive in this environment.
But many are calling for the eradication of all predators, native predators.
Doesn't sound very conservationist to me.
What does that mean?
Where does it end?
Why do we need to have more deer and less of others?
Why is it bad to see a coyote or lion.
I'll start.
On lands in Nevada...
Get rid of
Feral horses
Chukar
Huns
Snowcock
Mountain goats
All other introduced and non-native game species.
Allow for a balance of all native species, to include mule deer, elk, pronghorn, sheep coyotes, lions, bobcats and all other native species that were likely here before white man got here.
Im also not one that needs to kill a deer every year.
I also recognize whatever level we had at whatever time we look at, we won't likely have again. We have the here and now.
In regards to predators, we need a lid on them, but calling for the elimination of a species just makes us hunters look like bafoons.
We also have a limit of how many deer can survive and thrive in this environment.