Brn2hnt
Member
I was having a very good discussion the other day with an individual who was relatively unaware of the issues behind the transfer of public lands. However, he did bring up a point I couldn't refute at the time. The tenth amendment states that all rights not granted to the feral gov. shall be left to the states no? How is federal ownership of land constitutional? Is it because it is left to the states OR the people, ergo it can't be owned by the states as it would no longer then be the people? I am sure there is legal standing, otherwise this would have just been taken to the SC many years ago. I am just struggling with my google-fu to find where it is constitutional. Thanks for the help
Mike
Mike