In Missouri court, a choir director claims minister raped her

Quiet_One

New member
Joined
Jan 5, 2005
Messages
1,101
By Emanuella Grinberg, Court TV

(Court TV) — Supervisors at the Campbell United Methodist Church in Missouri had allegedly received complaints about Minister David Finestead before the choir director told them about the inappropriate comments he was directing at her.



But when those complaints went unheeded and Teresa Norris decided to resign in March 1998, she claims Finestead punched, raped and sodomized her in her parish office.


A jury finally began hearing Norris' claims this week in Greene County 31st Circuit Court, more than six years after she filed suit against Finestead and the Missouri West Conference of the United Methodist Church 1999 over his alleged behavior.


Finestead arrived in Campbell in 1995 after he was transferred from the Central Methodist United Church in Kansas City, Mo.

In his opening statements, Norris' lawyer, Michael Fletcher, plotted dates of other alleged complaints on a chart going back to 1995, suggesting Finestead had been transferred as a result of them, according to the Springfield News-Leader.


The church's attorney, Patrick McGrath, told jurors that the complaints were all considered to have been resolved and had no connection to the transfer.


"This is not a case of a sexual predator being moved from one church to another," said McGrath, adding that the church took immediate action after Norris reported the alleged rape more than two months later, the paper reported.


Finestead was removed from the Campbell United Methodist Church after the complaint and his minister credentials have been suspended.


On more than one occasion before the alleged attack, Norris says Finestead attempted to engage her in conversations regarding "female problems" and her ability to "lose weight in all the right places."


She claims he would often subject her to "prolonged gazing and staring at her breasts and other portions of her anatomy."


The plaintiff also described an "uninvited and unwanted neck rub in which Finestead moved his hands down her chest toward her breasts."


The suit alleges the defendant received similar written and verbal complaints from other female parish staff members before the March 25, 1998, assault on Norris. Several of those women are expected to testify.


McGrath addressed each letter and verbal complaint in his openings and said none of them suggested Finestead was a rapist, the Springfield News-Leader reported.


No one ever reported the incidents to police because they were ashamed, says Fletcher, and Finestead was never criminally charged, which is one reason he was dropped from the suit in March 2005.


Instead, Norris is now suing the church for unspecified damages for failure to supervise an employee and for intentional infliction of emotional distress.


"We're going after the church for not doing anything, they could have prevented this," Fletcher told Courttv.com. "Finestead was uncontrollable, and the only one who could have controlled him was the church, his boss."


Fletcher says his client underwent extensive psychological treatment and even attempted suicide since the alleged incidents.


The suit contends the plaintiffs "ratified" Finestead's behavior by allowing him to continue working "after the creation of a hostile work environment" to the point where members of the staff parish were told their superiors "would not tolerate any complaints against Finestead and that Finestead had the full support" of the church hierarchy, according to the suit.





Lawyers for the defendants attempted to claim immunity from the intentional failure to supervise clergy allegation through the Doctrine of Church Autonomy in the U.S. Constitution.

In their response to the complaint, they also wrote that Norris failed to show that the church's sole intention through its conduct was to cause emotional distress to the plaintiff, and asked to dismiss her claims.

Norris' husband, Sid, is also a plaintiff in the suit, holding the church accountable for "the loss of companionship, society, comfort, assistance, family support, economic support and consortium of his wife" as a result of the defendant's conduct.
:eek: :BLEEP:
 
Ok, i give it that least this aint a priest molestinga child, least i think when they call u a woman u are woman, naywho it still worng, why gods people would do that nad betray god big time real bad mistake and prob not to be forgivin from many including god, wich he may but doubt it then why is there hell:). Anywho, this chit needs stop and find back rounds stop beliveving all preachers,priest,ministers, are all good cause u wrong!!!!!!!!. to bad she and his wife had find that out, man he broke let me see, 2comandments, one crime, goodbye:D, i tohught be another catholic thing most are why i odnt know cause maybe the certain group of religion, believes wrong, dont get me wrong posters, i aint saying all catholics are that way:), just osme i htink thats prob:)
 
Sex is one of the driving needs of the human race. It cannot be denied. When you attempt to keep someone from having sex they find alternative methods, masturbation, homosexuality, rape, etc. Let priest and ministers marry, that may solve some of the problem. Then again, there are just some real nut cases out there too.
 
if you let them marry you may still have problems with them engaging in sexual acts with people who don't want it. These days poeple are strange and it seems no matter what you do, your gonna end up with some jerks.
 
Back
Top