Irrelevant
Well-known member
You know what doesn't get you into shape? Moderate Running, drinking beer, and coaching soccer. And lack of daylight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your wife lies better than mine.scale isn't moving at all, but wife says I look like I've lost a ton of weight and things fit better... so I count that as a win. Plus hiking in and out of the woods seems a lot easier these days
Sir, give it time. Marathoning has long been a past time for octogenarian+ https://www.oldest.org/sports/marathon-runners/I did a 100 push-ups and sit ups yesterday, my right shoulder tightened up out of nowhere 3 hours later I’m in pain it sucks , trying to see a physical therapist to a tissue massage. I’ll be on the mend for a little bit , I’m kinda pissed , gettin older ain’t for sissy’s

It's legit, i weigh more now than i ever have but i can also deadlift 2x my body weight and run a mile in 8 minutes so...scale isn't moving at all, but wife says I look like I've lost a ton of weight and things fit better... so I count that as a win. Plus hiking in and out of the woods seems a lot easier these days
That’s astonishing for a retired person!It's legit, i weigh more now than i ever have but i can also deadlift 2x my body weight and run a mile in 8 minutes so...


We’re going to start a go fund me for Mrs. Chris.That’s what she said
That is some steep stuff!I try to do this hike at least once a year - just to remind myself how out of shape I really am. 4100’ vertical in 3.5 miles. Last mile and a half is constant 25-30% pitch almost straight up a narrow ravine. Then last quarter mile is rock scramble on all fours. Going back down is what sucks the worst.
View attachment 294680

When I carefully track, I find the 3500cal/# to not be accurate. I also find I need far fewer than 2000cal/day for maintenance unless I am working hard.Fun experiment I've been running.
For years I used a fitbit, and I feel it greatly overcounted my steps, and thus my calories. For a couple years I've been using a Garmin Instinct, and it counts steps, and gives you a calorie estimate for your day. I wanted to put that to the test...
A tactic I use to stay on the rails is documenting everything I eat. In fact most of the time, planning the whole day's nutrition out. I track my daily caloric intake, and have been juxtaposing it against my theoretic burn as calculated by the Garmin.View attachment 301742
Since October 2, when I started this, I have averaged 3,034 calories a day in consumption.I have averaged burning 3,280. Over that span, that is a -10550 net.
There are 3,500 calories in a pound, and thus I should have lost 3.08 pounds over that span. But, I weighed myself on October 2, and also today, and I have lost nearly 14 pounds. That's a delta of 38,000 calories, either overestimated in my consumption, undercounted by my watch, or both. That's an error of over -800 calories a day!
Of course there's water and natural variation that could account for some oCAREFULLY TRACKf this, but I weigh myself frequently enough to know that my watch is undercounting my caloric burn. I'm pretty dialed in on caloric intake documentation. So, if I continue to try to stay ahead of my watch, I should continue to lose body fat.
I'll continue to run the experiment. Maybe there was an initial drop or something, and it will even out. Either way, kind of interesting.
There are 3,500 calories in a pound, and thus I should have lost 3.08 pounds over that span. But, I weighed myself on October 2, and also today, and I have lost nearly 14 pounds.