BigHornRam
Well-known member
I primed the economy a couple weeks ago, with 60 gallons of Benjamin Moore.Attacking the deficit one gallon of white paint at a time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I primed the economy a couple weeks ago, with 60 gallons of Benjamin Moore.Attacking the deficit one gallon of white paint at a time.
Of course you want that, I wish more people could attain the position I'm in. But the facts will quickly tell you that 98% of the American public wont.This is where I’m hung up.
You’ve said so yourself your home(s) are worth enough you could sell them and use the proceeds to hunt whatever you want, wherever you want. Perhaps paraphrasing.
Why would I not want that? Why is that not a good thing? You no doubt have sacrificed and scrimped where necessary.
Buzz is in the top 2% club. That's an amazing achievement! Based on the younger generation I know, the sky is the limit, and they are going to do well.....as long as they don't listen to grumpy old guys like Buzz telling them they won't.Of course you want that, I wish more people could attain the position I'm in. But the facts will quickly tell you that 98% of the American public wont.
The thing is I didn't have to sacrifice and scrimp.
I was lucky, born completely by chance at the right time, nothing at all to do with sacrificing and crimping.
I paid for college playing Pulaski motor for the FS. That math doesn't math these days.
I paid for over half a dall sheep hunt in Alaska with a 2 week fire check. Think anyone is clearing 15-20k in 2 weeks swinging a Pulaski these days to do the same?
Same with purchasing a couple houses, had wayyy more to do with my birth year than anything else.
There's just no way the playing field is the same for 25 year olds today than when I was that age. The few people that are claiming the younger generations just arent working hard enough, arent ambitious enough, aren't motivated, arent willing to sacrifice, blah blah, they're full of crap and need to hit the smelling salts.
Yes, but not near as high pitched as the "my property tax is too high" whine.Already high pitched whining and talks of tax increases.
I'm not arguing your property hasnt doubled in value in 5 years.Yes, I could afford the home we’re currently in all over again. Purchased back in 2020 and it has doubled in value. House payment back then was 14% of our monthly net pay (one income). With increases in taxes, insurance rates, and wages, our current payment is 10% of our monthly net pay. The home will be paid off in the next five years. There’s a big difference between needs and wants.
Great, cool there's cheaper houses, right alonf with lower average wages in other parts of the country. There is of course the issue of finding reasonable employment in those places.
Also fair to note, GM, Ford, Toyota, Walmart, grocery stores, insurance agencies, etc. don't particulary give 2 shits what your wage is or where you live. Those guys dont charge 10k less for their vehicles to help their fellow man who lives in an area with more affordable housing. Walmart, Safeway, etc don't charge a person based on their income.
So while you want to simply say, move to a place with lower housing prices, and I don't totally disagree with you, in many cases that cheaper housing may be as or even more out of reach for a variety of reasons.
I do appreciate the thought and it may work for some. I talk to a lot of people across the US and the common theme I hear is wages arent keeping up with the price of most consumer goods.
Sooner or later bubbles pop. They always do. That's the market correcting its self. What we don't need is the government stepping in and regulating the price of housing, like some here think we need to do. That will end in disaster.I'm not arguing your property hasnt doubled in value in 5 years.
I believe it.
What I fail to understand is how that is sustainable long term?
Certainly good for the person that was fortunate to buy at the bottom, but in all my years I worked, the best yearly wage increase I got was close to 5 percent.
Your home annualized at 14 or 15 percent.
I'm not arguing your property hasnt doubled in value in 5 years.
I believe it.
What I fail to understand is how that is sustainable long term?
Certainly good for the person that was fortunate to buy at the bottom, but in all my years I worked, the best yearly wage increase I got was close to 5 percent.
Your home annualized at 14 or 15 percent.
Agree on the debt free.It's not sustainable long term. I completely believe the bubble will pop and will eliminate the vast majority of "paper wealth." Because of this, I don't put much merit in the inclusion of equity when looking at a person's net worth (contrary to Dave Ramsey - love the guy though). At 2.25% interest rate on our mortgage, I almost feel like I'm stealing . . .
Some folks that I've chatted with insist on maintaining a mortgage to get a break on their income taxes, and while I understand their thinking, I'm not in that camp. Being debt free is a fantastic way to live.
I've been fortunate to purchase new homes at the absolute best times - housing crash of 2010 and early stages of COVID. Truth be told, I just got insanely lucky.
$520k a year to be in the top 2% in America. I didn't know gov work paid so well!Buzz is in the top 2% club. That's an amazing achievement! Based on the younger generation I know, the sky is the limit, and they are going to do well.....as long as they don't listen to grumpy old guys like Buzz telling them they won't.
Do digital papers count?If? Try picking up a paper once a year. Already high pitched whining and talks of tax increases.
Most likely, I've noticed houses in my area beginning to sit on the market when a few years ago those homes would have moved quickly. I think the combination of cost/interest rates are starting to show. Houses are still moving fast if the price is right though.
$520k a year to be in the top 2% in America. I didn't know gov work paid so well!
Correct, top 2% in net worth, and yes rental income and investment income is topping take home pay.Not to speak for @Buzz, but net worth and income are not the same thing. Guessing he’s talking about the former vs latter.
By the time a guy is in his 50’s, it becomes fairly common for income from one’s job to be secondary to investment income.
By the time a guy is in his 50’s, it becomes fairly common for income from one’s job to be secondary to investment income.