Paul-
As I should have realized (stupid me), sometimes when dealing with the mentally challenged, repetition is the key. I repeat, repetition is the key. Therefore, I shall again endevour to present you with the facts- not some liberal dogma. Just the facts.
1)Bush is a moron
2)He gets elected because there are, almost unbelievably, people out there with an even lower IQ's than he has (ref.- Paul)
3)He has taken a 250 Billion (with a B) dollar surplus, and turned it into a 400 Billion dollar deficit. This weakens the American economy significantly, and takes the Canadian economy down with it.
4)Like it or not, this deficit and your whopping great tax cuts will have to be paid for at some point by you, your children (God forbid), and your children's children.
5)He's hell on the environment. I suspect you live your life with a chain saw in your hand, so this is good for you. It's just bad for everyone and everything that doesn't happen to make money off his stupidity. So, now who's sucking at Uncle Sam's tit? Oh, yeah- that'd be you. How's that taste?
6)He took resources in the hunt for the asshole that masterminded the 9-11 attacks to make war on someone who, while being another complete asshole, was no imminent threat to anyone but the Kurds.
Add to these endearing traits a propensity for patronage that borders on illegal, and you have the complete package. As an example, President Bush's longtime business associate (and, of course, campaign contributer)was allowed to "craft" key portions of the Medicare bill, which could send millions to his own company. Sounds kinda like his energy plan, doesn't it?
Now, I'd love to debate your points in favor of good old George. Perhaps you could provide a couple. You haven't given a single point, valid or otherwise, that could lead to an honest debate. Come on, Paul- show us how smart you are.
Brushy/ Paws-
Do you ever find it odd that, in a country where everyone is willing to protect their rights under the Second Amendment to the death, that so many are willing to turn a blind eye to violations of their First Amendment?