You are correct, the new spending comes in the form of duck stamp increases, which total $145 million. The other $5 million was going to help reduce the deficit.
GOP shoots down Testers Sportsman's package
- Thread starter Khunter
- Start date
You are correct, the new spending comes in the form of duck stamp increases, which total $145 million. The other $5 million was going to help reduce the deficit.
jryoung
Well-known member
So how does the "Motion to Waive all Applicable Budgetary Discipline Re: Amdt. No. 2875" tie into this increase? Are the dems in effect saying, we should wave this because the revenue generated is directly from those most involved who supported the increase?
Also, when did this amendment come into play? Was it involved during the votes in September?
turkeyguy53
New member
Politics is no longer a topic I can tolerate and stay sane. I avoid the local and national news as much as possible. There are too many sad stories like thius that are too complex to digest and make any sense about. I just try to live day by day and be happy in my own skin. All of these problems will catch up to all of us at some time and I don't have the power to prevent any of it. The tax collecting government people will never give up any control of what they control. We are to suffer from them .
Se3ssions raised the issue earlier in the day yesterday during debate. The motion was made by Tester in an attempt to get around the objection. Under current Senate rules, 1 Senator can stall everything under the unanimous consent rule (If all 100 vote yes, not debate, the bill passes). Sessions knew that his caucus would not break ranks to vote for a D, so Tester's only route was to try and siphon off a few votes from moderate R's who felt that this bill did not violate the Budget Control Act, and since it was a fee not a tax, they should move it forward. Only one Republican, Olympia Snowe, voted for the motion. All else voted against, or were absent.
This brings up the other rule that the Senate has instituted: The Fillibuster rule. It requires a vote of 60 senators to move any legislation forward. In a bitterly divided congress, reaching 60 votes is next to impossible, especially if the caucus' get their heels dug in.
Some D's did not vote because they have ties to the enviros who opposed the bill (like Boxer, who at least had the stones to vote no.) The vote ended up coming down as 50-34. Several from each party sat it out because they knew 1.) It couldn't get 60 without them, 2.) They didn't want the heat of voting on it.
As for the Tester/Thune Amendment, here's the NRA's action alert on it from June 15th, 2012: http://www.nraila.org/legislation/f...-week.aspx?s="Tester-Thune+amendment"&st=&ps=
jryoung
Well-known member
Thanks Ben, that helps a lot.
shoots-straight
Well-known member
Then dude your part of the problem, not the solution. We can and will win if enough people get active. Trust me, you can have an impact.
dustinf
Active member
And this is why politics is ridiculous. Nothing is cut and dry, everything is about gaining wealth and re-election.
It's disgusting at it's best, and mother f-ing scary at it's worst.
It's a lot worse than watching sausage being made. I can stomach that.
This political gamesmanship makes me want to puke.
no, but do have some that live out west. think it's around the bitter roots.
d-bone20917
Member
Hey Ben, I read your article for Outdoor Life (I think) a while back about the Sportsman's Heritage Act that passed the House and how you hoped some of it would change. Like opening some roadless areas to motorized vehicles and opening up some public lands to gas and oil drilling. Was that all eliminated with Testers Senate bill?
dustinf
Active member
Or should it be, "And this is why politics ARE ridiculous" ?
Curse myself for being a math major.
Yes, this bill was much, much different than the Sportsman's Heritage Act of 2012 (A dubious name). It kept some of the components like the EPA lead ammo regulation ban and the increase in funding for shooting ranges but stripped out the anti-conservation measures such as the Antiquities Act betrayal and the provisions that would have harmed wilderness areas, etc.
Here's a run down of what Tester's bill included:
http://www.mtbullypulpit.org/2012/09/i-love-getting-emails-with-good-news.html
Here's the latest post on the issue from the Bully Pulpit:
http://www.mtbullypulpit.org/2012/11/alabama-slammer.html
Fire up those emails boys!
http://www.mtbullypulpit.org/2012/11/alabama-slammer.html
Fire up those emails boys!
Did the same last year, the tea party and their antics pushed me over the edge.
shoots-straight
Well-known member
That was going to be my next question. Maybe one of our County commissioners.
It's pronounced Bitterroots, the mountain range, and born and bred are called Bitterrooters. The rest are called Transplants.
Last edited:
shoots-straight
Well-known member
I made the call to show my displeasure at Sessions, you can too, and I would encourage it.
You can reach him at (202)224-4124.
You can reach him at (202)224-4124.
I pronounced it the way I intended. or should I say, spelled it the way I wanted to.
already made the call.
Nemont
Well-known member
The stupid part is that $145 million isn't even equal to a rounding error in the Defense budget or Medicare Program.
The money isn't a tax because only those who volunteer to buy a duck stamp are paying it. Sessions must have a deal cooking on the back burner that he knows he doesn't need Tester's vote for.
Stupid is as stupid does.
Nemont
The money isn't a tax because only those who volunteer to buy a duck stamp are paying it. Sessions must have a deal cooking on the back burner that he knows he doesn't need Tester's vote for.
Stupid is as stupid does.
Nemont
Similar threads
