Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping System

Gas Boom's Effect on Wildlife Unknown-- (BS! I know it)

Ithaca 37

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2001
Messages
5,427
Location
Home of the free, Land of the brave
Here's what's going on in western CO.

RIFLE, Colo. - Outfitter Jeff Mead feels a lot more comfortable with his feet in a set of stirrups, steering his horse into the rugged Colorado forest, than on an airplane 11,000 feet over his stomping grounds.


Mead soon forgot his unease during a recent tour over his backcountry haven as he pointed to the natural gas wells springing up across the land where he has taken hunters for 15 years.

"Elk and deer move out when rigs move in," said Mead, a lanky, mustachioed 50-year-old. "Up on the mountain during hunting season, if you sneeze, you can hear the elk running. So, don't tell me they like eating by a drilling rig."

The debate over what energy development is doing to wildlife is raging throughout the Rockies, where some of the nation's richest gas deposits lie under prime wildlife habitat.

The Rocky Mountain West has seen more than 50 years of oil and gas development, but the activity has skyrocketed in recent years. But some wonder about the long-term fallout on recreation, tourism and hunting — all of which sustained parts of western Colorado after the energy industry bust in the early 1980s.

"Every industry has a life span. At some point in time, this will be over and we want to remain here," Rifle Mayor Keith Lambert said.

Ron Velarde, the Colorado Division of Wildlife's northwest regional manager, said it is important to look at the whole picture.

"I think it's going to be some interesting times, between gas development, the possibility of oil shale and coal-bed methane, right in the middle of the wildlife Mecca of the state of Colorado," Velarde said. "I think that we all better be paying attention."

Mead's outfitting business has already taken a hit. He usually has 40 hunters signed up by now for fall trips, but has only 18 people lined up so far this year. He blames the drilling, which he said has decreased the number of elk, deer and bear in certain areas.

Velarde believes it's vital to research the cumulative impact of energy development on wildlife and he sees energy companies and environmental groups as likely partners.

Wyoming is ahead of Colorado both in the level of energy development and studying how it affects wildlife. Still, so much is unknown, said Hall Sawyer, a biologist with Western EcoSystems Technology Inc. in Cheyenne, Wyo.

A study by the consulting firm begun in 1998 and funded largely by the gas industry has found changes in the movement of mule deer as drilling has increased in their winter range in western Wyoming. Sawyer and his colleagues are still studying what that may mean for the animals in the long term.

Industry has gotten involved, too: Williams Production and EnCana Oil and Gas USA have teamed up with Colorado on wildlife studies and both documented through photographs and videos the flocks of wild turkeys and groups of deer and elk near their wells.

Bob Elderkin, an avid hunter and retired Bureau of Land Management employee, scoffs at pictures of elk near wells as proof that wildlife isn't being harmed.

"If you look at that herd of elk, every elk is standing. Nobody's lying down, every one of them has his ears up and they're on full alert," Elderkin said.

He tramps up and down the sagebrush-dotted hillsides near his Silt home and along stream banks, where he said he has found well sites that should been cleaned up by now or replanted grasses and plants that are poor choices for area wildlife. Elderkin said the BLM has the authority to demand better of companies.

"I think there's this notion that we don't want drilling, that we're anti-industry, but that's not the case at all," Elderkin said. "We want you to able to get the gas. We know it's happening, but let's figure out a way that we can still have some well being after you're out of here."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051002/ap_on_sc/shale_wildlife

*********************************************************

Oil-Price Surge Prompts New Look at Shale By SANDY SHORE, AP Business Writer
9 minutes ago



PARACHUTE, Colo. - The brush-covered landscape of buttes and desert just west of the Rockies, already dotted with oil and gas rigs, could be in store for another resource boom as the energy industry turns a fresh eye toward developing oil shale.


A reserve estimated at nearly 1 trillion barrels of oil buried deep in rock formations stretching from western Colorado into northeastern Utah and southwestern Wyoming may be a way to ease U.S. dependence on shrinking foreign oil supplies. The newly enacted energy bill was written to help open the way for research programs and commercial leasing of federal land containing oil shale.

Yet shale isn't a quick panacea to the nation's energy woes. This is oil that is locked up in rock, not deposits of liquid crude that are relatively easy to tap.

Companies have spent years researching how to melt oil out of rock, but it could be 2010 before any decide whether shale mining is commercially and environmentally feasible. It takes a large amount of water to recover the oil and the process can take months.

Many also worry about the effect a large-scale operation — particularly coupled with robust natural gas, coal and oil production already under way — would have on the environment, wildlife and the people who spent years recovering from the last shale bust in the early 1980s.

Amy Beasley, whose grandparents homesteaded on Parachute Creek near here, was just a child when major shale production began in the late 1970s. She has lived with the effects of the boom and the bust and, now, a surging interest in domestic natural resources driven of late by high crude oil prices and the effects of Hurricanes Rita and Katrina.

At her Old Mountain gift shop just off Interstate 70, Beasley welcomes economic development but worries about her family's water supply.

"I just wish they would have more compassion," she said of energy companies.

Pete Kolbenschlag, a director of the Colorado Environmental Coalition, said government leaders and residents recognize energy development is part of the landscape. The concern, he says, lies in balancing that with environmental protections and a move toward renewable energy resources.

"We know we cannot drill our way to energy independence," he said.

As the United States and other countries search for stable, reliable energy sources, the West is seeing new demand for natural gas, coal, uranium and oil — even if it's locked up in rock.

"There certainly has been a resurgence in mining, a resurgence almost unprecedented in modern times," said Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association. "We're in this sort of perfect storm where it seems all the factors of both domestic and offshore are suddenly in alignment."

The West's love-hate affair with oil shale has been waxing and waning for centuries. Legends are told of American Indians and pioneers who used the rock to light campfires, and a visitor information site in Parachute showcases the tale of a homesteader who built a fireplace out of shale only to burn down his house when he lit a fire for a housewarming party.

Shale oil is easy to see, appearing in dark, gray stripes within the brown rock. Most domestic resources are in the Green River formation under Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, and there were booms just after World War II and again in the 1960s.

When that one hit, Parachute was a farming and ranching community whose 300 residents felt safe enough to leave their doors unlocked at night. Roads were dirt, there was no police department and government was overseen by a part-time town administrator.

With the companies came thousands of workers who parked trailers where they could or slept in the streets, under bridges and even in root cellars, Parachute Mayor John Loschke recalled.

"This poor little community got slammed," he said.

Every day, streams of cars would head up a narrow, two-lane road carrying workers to shale mining operations in the buttes just west of town. Speculators bought up farm and ranchland in the surrounding valley.

There was suddenly new money for new schools, paved roads, a wastewater system and Exxon's worker housing development, which later became a retirement community called Battlement Mesa.

But when oil prices began to fall and government subsidies dried up, shale went south. Exxon shut down its $5 billion project on May 2, 1982, locking the gates and putting 2,200 people out of work. Nicknamed "Black Sunday," it is a bitter reminder of the bust.

"It was a dramatic shock to the community, obviously. That money was flowing in here like blood to the veins," said Robert Loucks of Grand Junction, Colo., a former manager of oil shale operations here for Shell and Occidental Oil Shale.

Loucks' operation and other companies continued working for several years before closing, but the regional economy was plunged into a tailspin that has taken years to repair.

Western Colorado has worked hard to diversify its economy by emphasizing tourism, recreation activities and retirement options. And now energy development is back.

The natural gas boom in particular has brought a fresh group of companies and workers to the region, packing hotels, restaurants and homes. Loschke says Parachute even has rush-hour traffic congestion at its main intersection, where there still is no traffic light.

In Vernal, Utah, also hit hard by the shale bust, workers are wanted for jobs in everything from energy development to retail. The town's population of about 8,000 is expected to double in 10 years.

"You take a look around, every place as a 'Help Wanted' sign. Workers from the downtown businesses are going out to the oil fields because they pay so well," said Tom Nemec, a safety consultant for San Antonio-based Pioneer Drilling Co. "Right now, the economy's booming. Everybody's on the bandwagon."

In July, a manager of another oil company walked up to the counter in a Vernal McDonald's with an offer for jobs. Two cooks were hired on the spot for roughneck wages of $18 an hour, plus a $1,000 signing bonus.

"It happens to us on a regular basis," complained McDonald's supervisor Sandra Richins as she took a break from the breakfast grill. She raised wages to $7 from $6 an hour and offers health insurance, but still can't compete.

"I lose about five people a month to the oil fields — and that's been going on for the last three months," Richins said.

Analysts and industry observers say it isn't a question of whether shale oil can be produced — it can — but whether it is economically and commercially viable in large quantities.

There are two basic retrieval methods used in several countries including the United States, Estonia, Australia, Brazil and China.

One involves mining the rock and heating it to a high temperature in an above-ground facility called a retort. It leaves a lot of leftover shale for disposal and requires huge amounts of water for processing.

The other is an underground process in which the rock is heated beneath the surface. Although it would not require as much water, pollution of underground water supplies and the air remain possibilities.

Shell Exploration & Production Co. has been testing this method with buried heaters in a remote stretch of Colorado, about an hour's drive north of here.

Terry O'Connor, a Shell vice president, said the company believes the process will be economical as long as crude oil stays above $30 a barrel, but the company is at least five years away from deciding whether to build a commercial-scale operation.

Near Vernal, Oil-Tech Inc. is using a retort to melt oil from shale. The privately held company has applied for a permit to mine on state land and is asking the federal government to let it use 30,000 tons of oil shale from a nearby mine.

Loucks says the technology is still several years in the future.

"We've been building plants for years, ever since at least 1920. Each one of them can get oil out of the rock," he said. "We know how to heat it up to 900 degrees but in no case have we ever shown that that may work and made a buck."

Still, many observers believe the West can handle an oil shale boom — and bust — if development is properly controlled. Communities have become more sophisticated with more diversified economies and the mix of people is broader.

"There isn't going to be any boom or bust," said Russell George, a native of nearby Rifle and head of the state Department of Natural Resources. "Nothing is going to happen very fast and frankly shouldn't."

___
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051002/ap_on_re_us/shale_s_comeback
 
Notice this? "In July, a manager of another oil company walked up to the counter in a Vernal McDonald's with an offer for jobs. Two cooks were hired on the spot for roughneck wages of $18 an hour, plus a $1,000 signing bonus."

Businesses can't find any kind of decent employees and will hire just about anyone who can walk thru the door. Even the loony tunes on my "Ignore" list could have lots of job offers the first day they showed up in Rock Springs, Vernal, Rifle etc. Real good wages, too!

I moved West from Vermont in 1974 to get in on the last oil boom. Unbelievable job market! All kinds of negative ramifications for wildlife, too, as developers and industry changed the landscape with more roads and encroachment on wildlife habitat.
 
Industry has gotten involved, too: Williams Production and EnCana Oil and Gas USA have teamed up with Colorado on wildlife studies and both documented through photographs and videos the flocks of wild turkeys and groups of deer and elk near their wells.
Hmm....I was a little closer to this situation this year than I care to remember. Let me just tell you this: The purpose of the "study" was to show that gas exploration has no effect on wildlife. There were many statements made with the word "obviously", which is a word that doesn't often appear in scientific studies. Also, at least one of those two companies mentioned is absolutely nuking the property they own in that area. The canyon bottoms were being filled with well pads. Some of the pads were literally touching each other.

I could go on, but I doubt many here really care. I could show you some pictures, too.

Oak
 
IT and Oak,

Our Montana Governor is promoting synthetic fuel and electricity production from our vast reserves of coal. What do you think of this? How about oil shale?
 
There was considerable interest in shale oil extraction back in the eighties when oil was in the $30 per barrel range. Millions were invested before oil prices fell to the point of extraction impracticality.
 
BHR- Lots of talk out there about synthesizing but the oil shale process is still kind of "in the wings" as it relates to a cost effectiveness and the actual oil produced.

Its been looked at time and time again (a lot since the OPEC days of the 70's) but the mining, transporting, and heating the shale (kerogen) and then adding hydrogen to the resulting product, plus the disposing of and stabilizing of the waste have made it a product without much backing. The processes also uses a considerable amount of water. Between the total energy and water requirements coupled with the environmental and monetary costs (to produce shale oil in significant quantities) the production so far is uneconomic.

Synthetics could prove very interesting but the key there is both in mass of production and who is willing to pay more for the product. It might take the role of a "green energy/green tags" type of product where people who are willing to pay more will be given some sort of option on product types.....

LOL- looks like Ken also rememebers those days....while I was rambling on :D
 
Marv, you hardly ever hear of synthetics without subsidization being mentioned. Wind turbines is another technology that 'blows my mind' (sorry :eek: ) when some of the gov't grant financing is exposed.
 
Marv,

Thanks for the short course on oil shale. I lived in Grand Junction during the time that Exxon pulled the plug on their oil shale project. Didn't know much about it or the politics behind it at that time....I was a snot nosed 19 year old. I do know that it had instant major economic impacts on that region.

Schweitzer claimed that diesel fuel could be made from coal for a buck a gallon on a national radio show last week (Glen Beck). Is this for real or is it snake oil?
 
Paul- That process actually shows some promise...in fact the state of PA is about to embark on a $600+ millin project that does just that. Unlike burning the oil shale directly as a very low grade, high ash-content fuel this process involves mixing gasified waste coal with oxygen and water, then heating it to 2,500 degrees F (about 4x hotter than the other process I mentioned) to produce a synthetic gas. The gas undergoes another chemical reaction to become paraffin wax, which is further refined into diesel fuel.

You still have some problems with energy CONSUMPTION during the process and you still create soot and leave behind toxins such as mercury but yu get a further benefit of reduced water demnad and pollution from culm and it does producing a cleaner-burning fuel.

I find the "buck a gallon" a bit hard to swallow given the indebted costs of starting such a process but with our country's relianace on fossil fuels, you've got to start somewhere.....
 
BHR,

I remember the Grand Junction shale boom/bust...I was working for a equipment rental/sales consortium & we put a branch out there....didn't last long.
 
Ken, it's kind of amazing how long this "new technology" has been around ;)
That first process I mentioned was used back in the 70's and the shale>diesel was (a close kin anyway) implemented back in the 20's!!!

We're all gonna be wearing flare bottomed cord pants if this keeps up... :D
 
Thanks Marv for your EXPERT KNOWLEDGE! I heard that Germany made their gas/diesel from coal during WW2 so the technology has been out there for awhile. Still has to make economic sense as well however. Going to be interesting times ahead, that's for sure.
 
Here's a story referencing my Oct. 3 post above. I like their sage grouse mitigation efforts. :rolleyes: |oo


EnCana praised for extra environmental studies
Monday, October 10, 2005
By MIKE McKIBBIN

The Daily Sentinel

PARACHUTE — A natural-gas operator often criticized — and fined — in western Garfield County is now being praised by regulators and conservationists for an unprecedented series of environmental studies and projects on a 44,000-acre parcel of land north of Parachute.

EnCana Oil and Gas wants to shift some of its focus from more populated areas such as Grass Mesa and West Divide Creek south of Rifle and Silt to the former Unocal property it acquired last year with their buyout of Tom Brown Inc, another gas operator.

Waterfalls, trout, deer, elk, turkey and sage grouse dot the landscape of EnCana’s North Parachute Ranch, along with the first of hundreds of gas wells planned over the next five years.

“We want to do the right thing in the interest of being an environmentally responsible operator and land owner,” said EnCana West Slope Environmental Coordinator Kim Kaal. “This is something that’s beyond anything we’d do for an environmental impact statement. I don’t think we’ve left any stone unturned.”

Duke Cox, president of the Grand Valley Citizens Alliance, a grass-roots group often critical of area gas operators, was impressed after a recent tour.

“To voluntarily comply with things like storm-water runoff regulations and put in a water circulation system that cuts down on truck traffic, emissions and particulates, I think they’re genuinely trying to do the right thing,” he said.

EnCana plans to drill approximately 100 wells on the property by the end of this year, 200 wells next year, 325 wells in 2007 and 450 wells in 2008.

The company believes there are 5.3 billion cubic feet of undeveloped gas reserves under the property.

North Parachute Ranch abuts the Roan Plateau, where the BLM developed a controversial draft management plan to address gas development potential. EnCana spokesman Doug Hock said the company wants to be “very careful how we proceed” as the BLM process continues. The company already owns mineral leases on top of the plateau.

Many of EnCana’s studies and projects were not requested or required by federal or state regulatory agencies such as the Bureau of Land Management and the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Kaal said.

The oil and gas commission fined EnCana $371,200 last year, the largest fine against a gas operator in Colorado, for drilling mistakes that led to the West Divide Creek gas seep and area water contamination.

Oil and Gas Commission Director Brian Macke praised EnCana for the voluntary studies.

“That’s a beautiful piece of property, and they’re to be highly commended for working on ways to help preserve it,” he said.

Kaal said some of the extra efforts EnCana has taken on the property were in response to criticism that the company would be able to do whatever it wanted on the property, with fewer eyes watching.

EnCana scientists and consultants, along with nine Colorado State University graduate students, conducted the studies this summer.

They included the installation of two air monitoring stations, groundwater monitoring wells, identification of wetlands, surveys and studies of insects and wildlife and mitigation projects put in place.

The $3 million to $4 million effort will last another four years.

EnCana helped form a working group with the Colorado Division of Wildlife and BLM and committed $60,000 per year for a three-year radio telemetry and population study of the greater sage grouse, a possible candidate for the endangered species list.

“There’s a couple leks on top of the mesa, and the vegetation they like to eat is right along the road,” Kaal said. “So I put up a yellow warning sign like you see for deer crossings, but with an outline of a sage grouse so truck drivers will slow down.”

DOW spokesman Randy Hampton praised EnCana’s cooperation on wildlife issues on the property.

“We’ve had a good working relationship with EnCana and with others in the industry in recent years,” he said. “We hope that continues because it hasn’t always been that way with the energy companies. Anytime a large landowner works cooperatively with us, it benefits wildlife.”

Hampton said special hunts EnCana allowed let first-time hunters have a good learning experience without the crowds and competition from more experienced hunters.

With an average elevation of 7,800 feet, North Parachute Ranch has 28,000 acres of surface and mineral rights owned by EnCana, some Williams Production Co. minerals and BLM property and minerals.

One of the seven drilling rigs now on the property was made in Italy. Italian rigs are shorter, quieter and take up less space than most rigs, Kaal said.

A 4,000-foot directional well, the longest reach yet in the tight sands of the Piceance Basin, was recently drilled, too, Kaal said.

EnCana believes it can drill up to 28 directional wells off one well pad in the years to come, Hock said.

“Tank less” wells and a centralized exploration and production site means fewer site visits and better wildlife mitigation, Kaal said.

Grass Mesa resident Garland Anderson said EnCana’s plans to focus on North Parachute Ranch are good news.

“I’m sure owning their property will relieve a lot of the headaches from complaints from folks out here,” he said. “I think this will be a win-win for them and for us.”
 
Just keep drilling, pulling a trailer with my big V-8 requires lots of gas... and deer season is next week... plenty of deer and turkeys where i`m going... :D :D
 
said EnCana’s plans to focus on North Parachute Ranch are good news.

“I’m sure owning their property will relieve a lot of the headaches from complaints from folks out here,” he said. “I think this will be a win-win for them and for us

hmmm...wonder if they feel the same way about Dutch Shell ? LINK

Couple other CO related notes:

Berry Petroleum Co. said Friday that it has purchased a 50% working interest in approximately 70,000 gross (60,000 net) undeveloped acres in Colorado's Phillips and Sedgwick counties from Chandler Energy LLC

Minnesota-based Xcel Energy, the holding company for the largest utility in Colorado, last Tuesday proposed an 11% increase for natural gas to cover its increased wholesale costs for the fuel. Together with the expected large increase in gas consumption with the outset of the winter months, the utility said customer bills could zoom up by 104% for typical residential customers and 94% for small businesses. If approved by state regulators, the higher rates would be effective Nov. 1.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
110,817
Messages
1,935,479
Members
34,889
Latest member
jahmes143
Back
Top