matt0550
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
- Messages
- 271
I'm just looking to see if any of you have ever used barkeepers friend in your tumbling media (dry) and if so what did you make of your results?
Recently I decided that I suddenly had the time on my hands to prep about 1800 223 casings that have been sitting in a bucket lonely and depressed. Upon dumping the bucket I quickly recalled why I had put them aside in the "get to it some other time" corner and saw how dirty they were (shot on a wet day and collected from dirt/mud/grass). A buddy told me years ago that he cleaned all of his really dirty brass in new walnut with a couple tablespoon of Barkeepers friend, so I decided to split the casings by headstamp and then form two batches of each stamp - one to be cleaned in walnut untreated and the other with walnut/barkeepers. I went about cleaning the untreated batch and the clean time was around 2 hours (and they were "decent" looking). I then ran the same run time on the other half with the barkeepers and WOW were they clean, however had a very satin finish and sort of dull feel to them.
I had concerns for how this might make them act in my dies and chamber and actually considered setting them aside. I call my bud who tells me that this was in fact the desired result and that it has no bearing on dies/chamber etc and that I should wash dry and prep just like the other batch. Last night I finally get through prepping the non barkeepers treated batch and start on the treated stuff - to my utter shock, they seemed to hold sizing lube better and offered a measurable decrease in the amount of force applied to the press handle. What was more interesting was that I seemed to have recovered on average about .0005 in neck size spring back that the non-treated brass was giving. I measured every dimension of the cases (both treated/not and sized/not) and can find no dimensional difference aside the average of neck tension being just about .0005 difference (tighter) on the treated stuff. No difference in wall/neck thickness and weights are the same, so it appears to have not removed a measurable amount of material. After running through the die they are much slicker and no longer have that dull feel to them.
What are your thoughts? I'm all ears - this was a worthwhile experiment for sure as the brass was all free and I have nothing into this but time and $3.00 worth of walnut/ $.30 worth of barkeepers friend.
Recently I decided that I suddenly had the time on my hands to prep about 1800 223 casings that have been sitting in a bucket lonely and depressed. Upon dumping the bucket I quickly recalled why I had put them aside in the "get to it some other time" corner and saw how dirty they were (shot on a wet day and collected from dirt/mud/grass). A buddy told me years ago that he cleaned all of his really dirty brass in new walnut with a couple tablespoon of Barkeepers friend, so I decided to split the casings by headstamp and then form two batches of each stamp - one to be cleaned in walnut untreated and the other with walnut/barkeepers. I went about cleaning the untreated batch and the clean time was around 2 hours (and they were "decent" looking). I then ran the same run time on the other half with the barkeepers and WOW were they clean, however had a very satin finish and sort of dull feel to them.
I had concerns for how this might make them act in my dies and chamber and actually considered setting them aside. I call my bud who tells me that this was in fact the desired result and that it has no bearing on dies/chamber etc and that I should wash dry and prep just like the other batch. Last night I finally get through prepping the non barkeepers treated batch and start on the treated stuff - to my utter shock, they seemed to hold sizing lube better and offered a measurable decrease in the amount of force applied to the press handle. What was more interesting was that I seemed to have recovered on average about .0005 in neck size spring back that the non-treated brass was giving. I measured every dimension of the cases (both treated/not and sized/not) and can find no dimensional difference aside the average of neck tension being just about .0005 difference (tighter) on the treated stuff. No difference in wall/neck thickness and weights are the same, so it appears to have not removed a measurable amount of material. After running through the die they are much slicker and no longer have that dull feel to them.
What are your thoughts? I'm all ears - this was a worthwhile experiment for sure as the brass was all free and I have nothing into this but time and $3.00 worth of walnut/ $.30 worth of barkeepers friend.