The way I see it. There are two issues here. First, when most folks hear disease they want to see bodies. They think of this like blue tongue or EHD where you can see extensive die offs and local population level affects are noticeable. CWD is not a disease like that. CWD took decades to get to 40-50% prevelance in deer herds in SE Wyoming. It takes 1-2 years for a deer that is positive to show clinical signs of CWD and then they may last a month. In that time they are at increased risk of predation or being hit by cars. You aren’t going to see a giant pile of bodies. And in the early years of CWD being found in an area, it’s not going to affect deer at a population level. Depending on how high deer densities are prevelance will increase slowly (took 40 years for prevelance to reach 40% in SE WY) or quickly (took 20ish years for prevelance to reach 50% in southern Wisconsin).
Long story short. It is a big deal. It’s probably the largest wildlife issue at this time. And it’s going to keep getting worse for the foreseeable future, because at this time there is nothing we can do about it.
The second issue I see here is a distrust for biologists in general. I can assure you that those folks with boots on the ground have the resources best interest at heart. I don’t know what moral agenda you could possibly be referring to, but I can tell you with absolutely certainty it doesn’t exist. Frankly, the assertion is ridiculous.