Boundary waters under attack

Well, the vote is in. The White House weighed in and a couple people flipped. It passed 51-49.

So much for public input. The abuse of the Congressional Review Act (CRA), used once in the first 20 years of its existence and now more than 40 times with Trump Administration 1 & 2, is disturbing. Tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of people provided comment on these public land management plans.

Comment was secured from the public, via the laws passed by Congress. Analysis was made by the scientists of the agencies. Recommendations published for debate. Final decisions were made and published. These plans were implemented anywhere from 20 years ago to 3 years ago. To overturn via the CRA, Congress is required to act within 60 days of implementation. So much for following that law.

Regardless of how one feels about the BWCA, the lead pipe treatment given to the process of public input should bother everyone. Too bad some of these assholes will be dead when the time comes to own the bad outcomes of the decisions being made with abuse of the CRA.
God damn it! That is about a depressing as it gets.
 
Danies and Sheehy were yes because of course they were always with the team. Real public land advocates those two. I laugh at those who keep believing the bullchit….
 
Idaho senators also voted yes. I just hope litigation slows it enough to get a new administration in before they break ground.
 
For clarification, this vote today was the vote to proceed with the official vote tomorrow morning. Which, all the vote counters on the inside have said this is exactly how the votes will be cast on the final round in the morning.

Which makes sense. Thune is no dummy. He never lets something come for a Senate floor vote unless he knows what the vote outcome will be.

So it's not officially over until the vote tomorrow morning.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
118,851
Messages
2,208,928
Members
38,674
Latest member
Bootleatherburner
Back
Top