Deez Nutz
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2024
- Messages
- 372
False, unfortunatelyTake a fishing pole and you're fine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
False, unfortunatelyTake a fishing pole and you're fine.
I was referring to streams that aren’t classified as “navigable” waters. If it is a “navigable” body of water you can legally access the public to hunt. If it is not “navigable”, it is still legal use the waterway if you stay below the high water mark, but only for water based activities. Gay, I know.@Deez Nutz you’re the second person I’ve heard say that about wading to an otherwise landlocked piece of public. But you’re allowed to take a boat down the same river and it’s legal to get to that landlocked piece? I’d love to argue that in court. If it’s a navigable river legal to public access via the high water mark, id love to see the language that says no wading only boating.
Whats the definition of navigable?I was referring to streams that aren’t classified as “navigable” waters. If it is a “navigable” body of water you can legally access the public to hunt. If it is not “navigable”, it is still legal use the waterway if you stay below the high water mark, but only for water based activities. Gay, I know.
Any property directly adjacent to a navigable body of water is fair game to use for whatever the regs allow. But if it is not considered “navigable” then you are only allowed water based activities, and @BuzzH that doesn’t mean you can “fish” your way to a parcel, hunt for the day, and then “fish” your way back out. I’ve asked the governing agencies specifically that, multiple times concerning multiple different situations.
This was fought out in the Root a long time ago. mtmuleyWhats the definition of navigable?
Whats the definition?This was fought out in the Root a long time ago. mtmuley
You know what it is. mtmuleyWhats the definition?
Show me where class 1 or 2 waters are exempt from being used to access public land that those waterways touch, I'm not seeing it.You know what it is. And the ruling in this particular case is probably different. mtmuley
What waterways are considered not navigable?I was referring to streams that aren’t classified as “navigable” waters. If it is a “navigable” body of water you can legally access the public to hunt. If it is not “navigable”, it is still legal use the waterway if you stay below the high water mark, but only for water based activities. Gay, I know.
Any property directly adjacent to a navigable body of water is fair game to use for whatever the regs allow. But if it is not considered “navigable” then you are only allowed water based activities, and @BuzzH that doesn’t mean you can “fish” your way to a parcel, hunt for the day, and then “fish” your way back out. I’ve asked the governing agencies specifically that, multiple times concerning multiple different situations.
Whats the definition of navigable?
What statute violation would you be cited for violating?
Yeah. The Mitchell thing doesn't really apply. My bad. mtmuleyShow me where class 1 or 2 waters are exempt from being used to access public land that those waterways touch, I'm not seeing it.
No, not at all...I'm just curious what waterways a person is able to fish that aren't class 1 or 2.Yeah. The Mitchell thing doesn't really apply. My bad. mtmuley
Well no kidding that's been on the books since it passed. There was clarification on that in the case of the Ruby River and a few others where county roads crossed the river being legal access points.Like I said earlier, I was told it’s gotta have legal ingress and egress, such as watercraft or recreational access points.