A lack of science?

[Northwoods Labs]

Quick google search shows that the "researcher" is from a group that is anti-hunting, so hardly unbiased. They looked for four "hallmarks" of scientific management including "independent review." Where's the independent review of their "research?" Something smells funny about this article.

Normally I am not one to immediately jump to these kinds of conclusions (that of wildlife researchers being anti-hunting). However, if you are talking about Adrian Treves, then yea I would say your statement is pretty accurate

 

[CampRipleyLF]

I like this guy!!

I also agree that the general public, and that includes the hunting public, has a weak understanding of science. And an even weaker understanding of statistics used in the science.

Second

 

[SO7mm]

The North American model may not be perfect and could use more data but it's hard to argue with the majority or the results. As it's already been said this seems like nothing more than an ant-huinting group trying to discredit the model.