Caribou Gear

300 Win with 22 inch barrel?

Drake hit it pretty close. I know a gunsmith who did tests with .308 barrels and he lost 22-24fps per inch he took off. Said loss will depend on several other factors including temp, altitude, twist, etc.
 
And I wonder if its any more or less for a bigger magnum?? I am not worried about 60 fps... I think I'll go with the 22 inch barrel. Now I just want to find a nice, light, comfortable, synthetic stock...

Any ideas?
 
The higher the original velocity the more gain/loss you will have per inch of barrel. I'm assuming you are over 3000 fps with your .300? If so, you should be somewhere right around that 30 fps/inch mark.
 
I would think you'd lose a bit more with a magnum because they typically use slower burning powder.
 
And I wonder if its any more or less for a bigger magnum?? I am not worried about 60 fps... I think I'll go with the 22 inch barrel. Now I just want to find a nice, light, comfortable, synthetic stock...

Any ideas?

I'd leave it at 24 and slip it in a mcmillan edge.
 
go with the Sako 85 Finnlight in 300 Win, it is relatively short and is only about an inch longer then the 300 WSM in this model
 
For my son's science project we took a .243 winchester with a 22 inch barrel and cut one inch sections off down to the legal limit of 16 inches and chronographed each change. We were using 100 grain spitzers which were just over 300fps out of the 22 inch barrel. At 16 inches we were just under 2600 fps. 400 fps in 6 inches. Roughly 66 fps per inch. That said, go to this site http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=ve...09&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=b085eb62,de78727 and you will find a SWAT test of the 308 and the 300Win where they went from 26 inches to 18 inches in one inch increments. With the 308 they had virtually no velocity change. With the 300 Win, they did not see a change until they went below 22 inches. The change increases the shorter you go, and is the greatest with heavy for caliber loads with slow burning powders.
 
OK, curious... I mentioned this to another guy and he said they got those results because they were using semi-autos with light loads...

Any thoughts on this??? Never mind, just looked at the article... they are using bolt guns.....
 
good stuff. I have a 300 mag and wonder about rechambering it to 300WSM I w3as told it could be done wiht the existing barrel but I'd loose some lenght. that article has me thinking that would be just fine as far as velocity is concerned. Anyone rechamber their guns similarly, using the same barrel in finished product?
 
You know Kh... from what I've read, the standard 300 is every bit the round the WSM is..... I think it would be a waste of money... JMO
 
good stuff. I have a 300 mag and wonder about rechambering it to 300WSM I w3as told it could be done wiht the existing barrel but I'd loose some lenght. that article has me thinking that would be just fine as far as velocity is concerned. Anyone rechamber their guns similarly, using the same barrel in finished product?

You would end up with an abortion of sorts.... You're going from a long action to a short action, feeding issues will result.

IF you had a short action rifle and a 300WM barrel, you could cut it and rechamber and put it on your short action... if it was set up for a short mag. However this would be a huge waste of money since you can find brand new 'take off' barrels for a 1/10th of the price it would cost you to dink around rechambering and fitting a 300wm barrel.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
115,531
Messages
2,100,385
Members
37,169
Latest member
pietr
Back
Top