he is by no means a hunter and i don't like the media referring to him as one of us. he is nothing more than a useless poacher who got caught trespassing on private property. and since the first 2 hunters were shot in the back i find it hard to believe he can even consider self-defense as...
thanks guys, have no intention of using that term or any other term that i do not know the meaning of that may offend people. i was just curious since i have never heard it in this area before. i don't even know if those programs are in effect in my area. but all the same, thank you for the info.
this may sound stupid, but i have heard the term " welfare rancher" alot but do not know what it means. i have never heard it from anyone in my area only on this BB and pertaining to the west coast. what is it? :confused: :confused:
not just no, but " HELL NO", why give criminals licenses. if your not legal then you are a criminal for being here. besides they can't read or understand our traffic laws. |oo |oo |oo :MAD :MAD :MAD
i just hope he didn't re-produce. do you think at any time the phrase " this might not be a good idea" ever crossed his mind????? :confused: :confused: |oo |oo |oo
in certain counties you can hunt with a rifle and that was one of these counties. how can this killer claim self-defense when he shot the first two hunters in the back?? i have absolutely no respect for poachers and trespassers and they should be shot on site.