What Would He Score?

[IEATELK]

Id say tree tirdy

 

[corndog1]

I have a bull very similar to the second bull on this thread that scored 333" green.

 

[Edogg32]

He'd score a section of wall in my house!

 

[geewhiz]

I’ll estimate 153” per side conservatively - double it, then add inside spread - which I can’t see in either photo. He’s 350 class

No offense but i say no chance. 320's is my guess.

 

[The Hedgehog]

No offense but i say no chance. 320's is my guess.

Curious to the numbers you're using to get to that. The 2nd bull would eat the first one alive and poop him out in a tiny little ball. he's big.

It reminds me of this one:

 

[geewhiz]

Curious to the numbers you're using to get to that. The 2nd bull would eat the first one alive and poop him out in a tiny little ball. he's big.

It reminds me of this one:

I mean I'm sure you have much more experience judging bulls than me. Im just saying 350 is a darn big bull, and that second bull definately didnt strike me as that big. Could be wrong, wouldnt be the first time.

Nice shot an a sweet bull btw

 

[rogerthat]

290 on the first bull and 330 on the second(good mass)

How about this one?

 

[geewhiz]

290 on the first bull and 330 on the second(good mass)

How about this one?

I dont know but I would definately say biggest yet. >340" Whats your guess?

 

[The Hedgehog]

I think #2 is a lot bigger than #3 and could never guess a score on #3 because I can’t see much of it.

 

[The Hedgehog]

People really underestimate how much a really large body on a bull elk makes antlers less impressive. You’d probably never guess this one at about 420.

 

[MTLabrador]

People really underestimate how much a really large body on a bull elk makes antlers less impressive. You’d probably never guess this one at about 420.

That’s why I always shoot elk with less impressive looking antlers, just to be on the safe side.

The buck next to him is easily 30” tall.

 

[Derek44]

People really underestimate how much a really large body on a bull elk makes antlers less impressive. You’d probably never guess this one at about 420.

That’s an awesome picture. That deer really gives perception to how massive that bull is. That’s crazy

 

[rogerthat]

People really underestimate how much a really large body on a bull elk makes antlers less impressive. You’d probably never guess this one at about 420.

Yuge!!!

 

[The Hedgehog]

Yeah the rack doesn’t look ridiculous when sitting on that propane tank. Here it is ..

 

[mtmuley]

Yeah the rack doesn’t look ridiculous when sitting on that propane tank. Here it is ..
View attachment 241181

Does that belong to who I think it does? mtmuley

 

[TheTone]

Yeah the rack doesn’t look ridiculous when sitting on that propane tank. Here it is ..
View attachment 241181

I thought it was that bull. Ridiculously impressive

 

[mountainlaurel3]

People really underestimate how much a really large body on a bull elk makes antlers less impressive. You’d probably never guess this one at about 420.

Damn, that picture is real? The buck size differential makes it look like some kind of optical illusion.

 

[stk]

Yeah the rack doesn’t look ridiculous when sitting on that propane tank. Here it is ..
View attachment 241181

That’s a big elk.

 

[rogerthat]

I think #2 is a lot bigger than #3 and could never guess a score on #3 because I can’t see much of it.

@Greenhorn is fairly spot on. Short beams, small body, and not that great of a photo. Bull #2 is much bigger

 

[mdeerjunkie]

Wasn’t able to hunt archery this year. Went to pick up my camera yesterday and had these guys on it. Any idea what they would score? They look pretty dang nice, and a shooter in my book. This is in a pretty below average unit in CO.
Bull 1


Bull 2