I would very much like to hear your thoughts
Some examples:
1. Russia has committed the entirety of the ground force it put together and has yet to seize any of its key objectives.
2. As early as 3-4 days after the invasion started, Russia was forced to employ units as frontline forces that its doctrine indicates should be well behind the front lines normally used to enforce law and order.
3. Russia failed to prioritize its efforts and mass its combat power against key objectives.
4. If the plan was to make initial contact and then reorient against soft spots, Russia would have had to have significant logistical support sitting just across the border prepared to resupply rapidly to insure units could seize initiative.
5. Russia only had 3-5 days worth of precision guided munitions available for the entire offensive.
6. Russia is now moving additional units from Eastern Russia to the conflict area.
7. Russia is attempting to compel Belarus and Syria to form "shock battalions" to employ in Ukraine.
8. Russia is slowly backing off its demands during negotiations.
9. The Chief of Staff of the Belarusian Army High Command submitted his resignation, not wanting to be involved with Russia's war.
10. When the Russian Army is frustrated, it conducts punitive strikes against civilians and cities.
11. Russian analysts were instructed to do analysis of this fight, under the guise of a wargame, and were told that analysis favorable to Russian success was encouraged.
These are just off the top of my head.