https://www.themeateater.com/conser...ater-conservation-fund?utm_campaign=President Trump Tweets Support for Fully Funding Land and Water Conservation Fund&utm_content=1583364284&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR19ub-kzipBpWiNOzVtNEylnEZV7UXcXzTv9kIW0BXBl7QC1bLPNTEAA1A
Trump Tweets Support For LWCF.
- Thread starter BWALKER77
- Start date
Schaaf
Well-known member
I’m sorry
dan.kirkpatrick
Well-known member
this is good to see,,thanks trump
The Hedgehog
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2000
- Messages
- 11,641
The Hedgehog
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2000
- Messages
- 11,641
jryoung
Well-known member
Just don't ask the Secret Service what it means when Jill and Joe go "full cobra"
noharleyyet
Well-known member
MO Betta
Well-known member
It was still a lot less than the money he would lose if Bernie somehow became president. I despise Bloomberg, but that was a smart play by him.
Last edited:
rjthehunter
Well-known member
JM77
Well-known member
More winning...
Muley_Stalker
Well-known member
Trump is trying to get re-elected.
This is how he really feels.
earthjustice.org
This is how he really feels.
What the Trump Administration Is Doing to Your Water
The administration is attempting to undo the landmark 1972 Clean Water Act. Read on to learn why you should be concerned.
earthjustice.org
noharleyyet
Well-known member
From the op's article
The press conference held an air of positivity and bipartisanship rarely seen in these divided times. There is great optimism that coming legislation will move quickly from the Senate to the House to the president’s desk for a signature. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia might have said it best: “Politics be damned, let’s just get it done.”
The press conference held an air of positivity and bipartisanship rarely seen in these divided times. There is great optimism that coming legislation will move quickly from the Senate to the House to the president’s desk for a signature. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia might have said it best: “Politics be damned, let’s just get it done.”
RobG
Well-known member
I think Trump just heard that his position put Daines in jeopardy of losing his seat because of a new threat named Steve Bullock.Trump is trying to get re-elected.
This is how he really feels.
What the Trump Administration Is Doing to Your Water
The administration is attempting to undo the landmark 1972 Clean Water Act. Read on to learn why you should be concerned.
BigHornRam
Well-known member
Big mouth Schumer just crapped on Bullocks sliver of hope, Rob.
And the Vichy Gov't. really represented the will of the French People.
There have been bills to do this for the last 7 years at least. That's when Rob Bishop decided to try and kill LWCF andthe GOP was going to go along with it until there was a huge uprising against letting LWCF die. The Fund did die for a time, in fact, as the GOP led congress failed to renew it in time.
I'm glad to see Trump change course on this one issue related to conservation. If that means we have to constantly hold the threat of losing your job over the head of our senators then so be it. But to think that this represents a growth in the heart of the administration towards public land, sportsmen or conservaton ignores their track record & their current plans to eliminate wildlife standards on over 60 million acres of public land.
Garnder is likely toast in CO. Daines is underwater & really not well liked in MT. This is about trying to keep them in the senate. Manchin is an opportunist who never loses votes by sucking up to the GOP.
BTW - Tester has had this bill in congress for a helluva long time without Daine's support (which only happened in 2015 after massive blowback for his shitty votes on the issue), with the GOP stopping it the whole time.
beginnerhunter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2016
- Messages
- 1,320
That sounds like great news! Am I supposed to be pissed that Trump voiced support for an issue I care about even though he doesn't really believe in it? Should I give back my 3% federal employee raise because Trump didn't want us to have it? I'd have to be pretty naive to think most politicians are motivated by anything beyond self-preservation. But a win is a win, folks.
noharleyyet
Well-known member
If you say so Ben.
I do. We have an administration that elimiated protections for the air we breathe & the water we drink. They have the distinction of being the administration with the largest rollback of conservation designations in the history of the United States. They have leased key wildlife migration areas at fire-sale prices, which preclude management options to improve wildlife habitat. Yet we'll all galdly clap that we get the easiest lift possible done after a decade of beating the shit out of these people.
Maybe I'm prickly, but I'm damned tired of having to fight our own government to have a decent place to live. I'm glad that this is being done, but to paint this as some great move for conservation ignores the entirety of what's happening in this nation when it comes to the conservation of public lands, wildlife and resources.
Rand Paul can stop this in it's tracks by simply objecting to UC.
Similar threads
