Road War?!?

1_pointer

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 20, 2000
Messages
18,089
Location
Indiana
By Brent Israelsen
© 2003, The Salt Lake Tribune

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management has initiated a criminal investigation of two elected Kane County leaders who uprooted numerous signs inside a controversial federal reserve in southern Utah.
Kane County Commissioner Mark Habbeshaw and Sheriff Lamont Smith removed at least 31 Carsonite signs -- thin, floppy 4-foot-tall markers -- from routes in the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, created by President Clinton in 1996.
All of the signs indicated prohibitions of all-terrain vehicles and motorcycles.
Habbeshaw and Smith took the signs to monument headquarters in Kanab on Aug. 13, along with a letter defending their actions and ordering the BLM to remove additional signs on the county's purported roads.
BLM officials are not amused.
"It's definitely something we are looking into. We are concerned about it," said Keith Aller, special agent in charge of BLM law enforcement in Utah.

Removing or destroying federal signs on federal lands is a crime. But Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Lambert would not speculate on whether charges would be filed in this case.
Habbeshaw could not be reached for comment, but Smith said he and the commissioner were within their legal authority to remove the signs.
"These roads have been used for years and years and years," said Smith, an all-terrain vehicle enthusiast. "The roads we took signs off of are roads that definitely have the history to be" county rights of way.
State officials who are trying to resolve the sticky issue of road ownership on federal lands condemned Kane County's actions.
The sign removal comes four months after Gov. Mike Leavitt penned a "memorandum of understanding" with U.S. Interior Secretary Gale Norton that outlined a process for determining which routes across federal lands legally qualify as rights of way under a 19th century law called RS 2477.
Kane County's recent provocation does not help that process, said Leavitt aide Randy Johnson.
"It is very unfortunate," said Johnson, who is meeting today with county officials from around the state to discuss the Norton-Leavitt agreement. "We have a cooperative process going on here to identify roads. I just think it is not good timing to be doing things outside of that effort."
Leavitt's chief counsel, Gary Doxey, said the state will not defend or financially support Kane County in this case.
In the Aug. 13 letter to the BLM, Habbeshaw, writing on behalf of the County Commission, asserts that the 31 BLM trail signs were placed on the county's RS 2477 routes, and he cites a Utah law that allows removal of unauthorized signs on state and county rights of way.
"It is believed that additional [Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument] signs are obstructing public access upon county roads in violation of state law," states the letter.
Monument manager Dave Hunsaker countered that the legality of the county's RS 2477 claims within the monument has never been established.
"Just because they claim it doesn't mean it is so," Hunsaker said.
The signs were put up three years ago during the tenure of Hunsaker's predecessor, Kate Cannon. But Smith said the signs were to have contained only route numbers, not restrictions.
The sheriff said the county asked Hunsaker twice in recent months to remove the signs but no action was taken.
"As usual, we have been totally ignored," Smith said. "We felt this was the only way to let them know we are serious."
Hunsaker said his office was working to address the county's concerns.
"They wanted [the signs] out. I didn't want them out. So they went and took them out."
The sign removal is one of several provocative actions taken by Kane County officials and residents since the monument was created in September 1996.
* In October 1996, Kane County bladed roads inside several wilderness study areas within the monument's boundaries. The U.S. Attorney's Office filed a civil complaint against the county, but the case, in which a district judge narrowly defined what constitutes an RS 2477 right of way, is still pending.
* In November 2000, a group of Kane County ranchers traveled to Sevier County and coerced the sheriff there to release about 50 head of cattle that the BLM had impounded from the monument. U.S. Attorney Paul Warner initially expressed outrage over the incident but in the end filed no charges.

**I think they should nail these guys for any and all laws that they broke, in addition for paying for new, more permanant signs. Time for the big dog to show the little dog who runs the show.
 
Interesting. There are rights, at least under state laws, for "prescriptive easements." (Meaning that a right of way or easement that has been used for a prescribed period of time (usually 5 or 10 years) cannot be taken away.) I have no idea if there are any Federal provisions similar to the above.
 
Interesting
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif


I would guess this is all going to come down to the definitions of use and easement.
rolleyes.gif
rolleyes.gif
 
It's about time local and state governments quit cowing down to the federal government. Every year we lose more access to public lands.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>It's about time local and state governments quit cowing down to the federal government. Every year we lose more access to public lands. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>Could you please elaborate to the lost access you've experienced? I've never been to NM.
 
What I have seen in the last eight years is the BLM creating wilderness study areas and closing roads to the public. They allow the ranchers and BLM employees to use the closed roads. There are at least five wilderness study areas in the area I hunt.
The forest service doesn't maintain the roads and do not allow the ranchers to maintain them. After they are impassable the FS just closes them. If you can't get the well rig to the wells thats one less water tank for the cattle and wildlife. This might not be a problem in areas that get lots of rain but here we average about 12 inches a year.
I have seen several land exchanges that impacted access to my hunting areas, by BLM Forest Service and State Land Office.
In the area that I have been elk hunting for the last twenty years BLM did a trade that allowed the ranch to block public access on a forest service road that has been in use for at least twenty years. The road is still used by the ranch and by the outfitter.
 
Thanks. I assumed WSA's were what you were referring to. The one's I'm familiar with in UT have limited motorized access, but can be accessed entirely by foot or stock.

I know about the lack of water, the area I'm working this summer averages less than 10"/yr and is well below that this year. They are having to haul water for the 'wild' horses.
 
Yep, TB, it is crap. The BLM is mandated by law to do so. I just hope some wolves make it to where they are!
biggrin.gif
That would make for an interesting political atmosphere. Wild Horse and Burro Act vs. ESA!
eek.gif
 
Ollin Magnetic Digiscoping Systems

Forum statistics

Threads
111,382
Messages
1,956,823
Members
35,154
Latest member
Rifleman270
Back
Top