So previously in this thread it was mentioned that the current regime is pressuring social media companies about posts made that are critical of the admin or its policies.
I certainly hope it isn't true that the current leadership is doing that. It was wrong of past leaders to have anything to do with that and IMO the punishment was not adequate. If indeed current leadership is pressuring censorship they should be dealt with accordingly and an example set that will deter this in the future. No place for it.
Well, you know, the current administrations playing with the mainstream media. So what makes you think they won't play with social media?
I hope you said the same thing during the last presidential term? right? I have no issue with calling out incorrect information being reported. Both ways. It's everywhere. I do have a problem with trying to silence accurate information. It would also be helpful if MSM ensured the accuracy of their reporting.
Tactics chosen and used is completely unrelated to local agency cooperation /collaboration.
The tactics are obviously different if they picked up the person from the jail while in custody versus chasing the same person down on the street.
Not even remotely what I’m speaking to.
Here is what I was sent after getting in touch with a law group and getting on their email list.
Absolutely not the case. From dozens of people and direct relatives I know who live there. Some of whom have had key roles in the republican party. They tell me this "miscalculation" has things backfiring so much it obscures the fraud and other issues they had hoped to make an issue of in next falls election. Recent democratic caucuses had record first timer turn outs. This hurt and hurt bad and is not going away soon, if ever.
I will take things that didn't happen for $500 please. Maybe your google account is different then mine. Mine does not include my Social or DL number. I would however agree that the Afghanistan pull out was horrid. Some good people were left behind and their is still those working to get them out. With that said let us pretend that what you just posted is unbiased and accurate. This guy helped the US interest. He was neglected during the pullout. He now is seeking asylum and the US says no? Why? IDK. Because everything is screwed up and we are slowing down to correct it. Because we don't care? Who knows. Or could it be he is not as genuine as reported and may have some associations that are being investigated before turning him loose in the US? If he does have some associations that are questionable and they are actively seeking to investigate a lone letter of support may be worth investigating? Still don't think it happen. But who knows
I said everyone I know is happy with it... I don't know Scott.
When we only see the country as red or blue, friend or enemy, we are all screwed as a nation. Chances are pretty good that if one of the folks from the reddest spot on that map met another one from the bluest in the grocery store aisle, they would say "excuse me" and "thank you" and not think a thing of that person's political views.
I hate ICE. You have a pedophile in your profile pic so I can already tell the type of people you associate with.
It's the politicians I have a problem with. I have a problem with billions of dollars being wasted. I know a lot of level headed people from both sides of the aisle. Neither like the extremists on either side. MN could benefit from a leader who supported the state.
