Nope smokers not allowed

[Exhausted]

My doctor every time he reads my cholesterol. But I'm pretty sure it's just my nerve wrackin sons of bitches alcoholic family driving those numbers up.

Purely for giggles . . .

 

[Frequently Banned Troll]

Fair enough. Not all mormons are from the Utah/Southern Idaho stronghold.

They’re taking over the world, which is fascinating to me. I read & listen to a lot of material on it. I’ve many friends who are “members.”

I’m looking forward to quenching my thirst/habit/addiction/dependency/lust for an excellent IPA tonight.

 

[elkduds]

pfffft do people still actually believe red meat is bad for you?

 

[Irrelevant]

I have a tongue-in-cheek question, bringing this back to mingling substance use with firearms. Harkening back to your comment about a drink after work makes you better able to deal with kids or other annoyances.

Would you prescribe a beer before the hunt as method to relax and be better able to control "buck fever"? A beer before target shooting to calm the nerves? If not, why not? If yes, how is it justifiable?

No. Because that would be like drinking in church. I honestly don't drink when I'm in the woods at all, outside of a glass of wine at the end of the day when backpacking.

I would argue addiction is intrinsically bad from one perspective: It reduces/eliminates rationality.

I would simply disagree that your statement applies universally.

Especially when the substance in question is labeled carcinogenic by WHO.

So is sunlight. Also, Mr. BigMac

 

[TOGIE]

important to note that Group 2A means "probable" and mounting mechanistic and epidemiological evidence and re review of such epidemiological evidence continues to weaken that further.

group 1 doesn't carry such uncertainty.

which is why i try to limit those things. i'm sure that monthly to semi monthly big mac will be the death of me, quarter pounders are better anyway

nicotine isn't classified as a carcinogen (i'm sure they could twist the data to say so), but it's definitely not good for you. regardless, lifetime dopamine stimulation comes with neurochemical risks. many reasons i need to be done with it.

 

[NoWiser]

I’m looking forward to quenching my thirst/habit/addiction/dependency/lust for an excellent IPA tonight.

I’d argue that if you’ve reached a point where you’d let an IPA anywhere near your tastebuds, you might have a problem.

 

[Frequently Banned Troll]

I’d argue that if you’ve reached a point where you’d let an IPA anywhere near your tastebuds, you might have a problem.

Scientologist?

 

[NoWiser]

Scientologist?

Busch Light aficionado.

 

[SAJ-99]

I believe the wording on that question is "unlawful user of or addicted to"

Good catch. I should have noticed that. Probably watching too much March Madness. The clarification in bold that they put on the form would certainly imply that if the cannabis was a Rx it would still be illegal. So clear as mud.

 

[Forkyfinder]

“Could the government prohibit an unlawful drug user from possessing a car?”
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh

In oral arguments - Kavanaugh suggested that while the government has a clear interest in preventing unlawful drug users from driving cars, that restriction does not automatically translate to a legal justification for prohibiting them from possessing firearms under the Second Amendment. Im inclined to agree.

Be interesting to see how this falls - cheering on hunter biden getting his gun rights back

Hunter Biden - your gun rights appear to be restored.

Go forth and frolic in a drug fueled rage with your strange lovers, rejoice in the fact the guns and drugs wont be a crime - simply because they are next to eachother anyway.

United States v. Hemani (24-1234)

Prosecution of Ali Hemani under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) — for knowingly possessing a gun in his home while being an unlawful user of a controlled substance — is inconsistent with the Second Amendment.

www.scotusblog.com

May some of you have a better day tomorrow, im sure this is a disappointment to non 2A extremists.

 

[Irrelevant]

Interesting ruling.

 

[Forkyfinder]

Interesting ruling.

9-0.

I was suprised.

 

[elkduds]

 

[westbranch]

Relevant, recent, (and real) Hunter Biden tweet:

 

[Wind Gypsy]

Hunter Biden - your gun rights appear to be restored.

Go forth and frolic in a drug fueled rage with your strange lovers, rejoice in the fact the guns and drugs wont be a crime - simply because they are next to eachother anyway.

United States v. Hemani (24-1234)

Prosecution of Ali Hemani under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) — for knowingly possessing a gun in his home while being an unlawful user of a controlled substance — is inconsistent with the Second Amendment.

www.scotusblog.com

May some of you have a better day tomorrow, im sure this is a disappointment to non 2A extremists.

The majority of Americans support legalization of Marijuana. I would venture to guess that the majority of them don't think anyone who casually uses or posesses MJ should have different firearm ownership restrictions.