New threat to 2nd A?

I've pretty well maintained that we don't know everything about either case and that they were very questionable, but quite possibly justified. Someone in search of truth is going to find it - probably when the courts decide.
Major cope. Nothing before or after the video of the shootings is relevant to if the shooting are justified. Only the things happening at that specific moment in time are relevant to a good or bad shoot.
The only question is would a reasonable person believe they had to use deadly force to protect themselves or others.


These statements show your true colors.
 
Major cope. Nothing before or after the video of the shootings is relevant to if the shooting are justified. Only the things happening at that specific moment in time are relevant to a good or bad shoot.
The only question is would a reasonable person believe they had to use deadly force to protect themselves or others.


These statements show your true colors.
It's rich for you to personally attack me because you disagree with my assessment. It shows your true colors you ignorant prick.

Youre a pathetic human being with fake moral superiority showcasing your virtue on the Internet.

Guaranteed you're a coward in person.
 
It's rich for you to personally attack me because you disagree with my assessment. It shows your true colors you ignorant prick.

Youre a pathetic human being with fake moral superiority showcasing your virtue on the Internet.

Guaranteed you're a coward in person.
Wow. I didn't mean to hit a nerve feel free to back that up anytime your in Idaho hit me up.
 
Wow. I didn't mean to hit a nerve feel free to back that up anytime your in Idaho hit me up.
I mean you haven’t really been interested in conversation just blame. I’m surprised these threads have made it as long as they have. I enjoy seeing other’s perspectives it’s to bad we all see the need to take jabs
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5926.png
    IMG_5926.png
    602.4 KB · Views: 16
I mean you haven’t really been interested in conversation just blame. I’m surprised these threads have made it as long as they have. I enjoy seeing other’s perspectives it’s to bad we all see the need to take jabs
You did pick a side when you were obviously dismissive of my points even admitting you hadn't heard of them or look them up.
 
Meanwhile, back in Colorado.

CO Dem tyranny reigns supreme in the centennial state. Absolute unchecked power. Gonna divert money and resources from CPW to a firearms licensing scheme and registry. Got a few more awesome gun bills in the hopper currently. Expansion of red flag laws to further erode due process, registration and FFL transfers for all firearm barrels, and ban on NFA items including suppressors.

You might say, well I am just sportsmen and that gun stuff doesn’t really affect me. Well, the CO Dems have something for you too! Ban on any beaver harvest through the legislature. State Senators will likely confirm and place another 2x anti-hunting activists on the CPW Commission soon in this session. Same Dem confirmed commissioners will likely pass fur ban in March, look at all furbearers and cougars in May. And the real beauty, a ballot initiative in the fall to eliminate/neutralize CPW and the commission and replace it with a board of environmental activists from the state universities with no sportsmen or agriculture representation.
 
What I’ve gathered from this thread thus far. I think…

It’s “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”, unless the infringers are OUR infringers. But if the infringers are the other team’s infringers, then we have problems. And as long as they stick to infringing the other Amendments, just not the Second Amendment, we’re alright with infringement. But again, it has to be the right infringers doing the infringing on the right amendment.

Do I have that right?
 
How did all those in protest at the VCDL protest in 2020 manage to not have any incidents with armed protestors everywhere?
 
Back
Top