RaiderRich
Well-known member
I agree with the majority of people here.  243 is perfect, just keep the shots under 400 yards, preferably 300 or less and you have plenty of energy to kill a mule deer.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rock the .243. I've killed a lot of bull elk with it. Just shot placement. You throw a hole through a lung or heart on any animal and it's not going to live. People don't give the .243 enough credit.I have had my 3rd neck surgery and will need to lessen recoil going forward. I am mainly concerned with antelope and Mule deer. I own a .243 and a 7MM Rem Mag currently. Would I be better off shooting reduced recoil rounds through the 7mm Rem Mag or purchase a different caliber? I think the .243 would suffice for antelope but may be pushing it for a big mule deer. Any thoughts?
95 Grain SST's work wonders....243 with either the 80gr TTSX or the 85gr TSX is my suggestion. If I was limited to that rifle, there’d be very few animals I’d be hesitant to use it on at modest distances. Mine with the 85gr TSX has worked great on a bunch of deer and a pronghorn so far.
Actually used them for a couple seasons. Didn’t impress me much. Very explosive up close. Very accurate bullet for my rifle, but I’m sticking with the Barnes.95 Grain SST's work wonders...
Speakin a supressors how often do they need cleaning and what's the best way to do that?
I had the neck fusion also and I don't recall being told to reduce recoil. I don't shoot anything heavier than a 6.5-06.
I had dismal results with SST's used on antelope. They're pretty explosive IMO. I went to Barnes TTSX bullets and never looked back.95 Grain SST's work wonders...