I get that people are angry about mule deer in MT (I mean, we’re going on close to 60 pages now).
I’ve known Brett for years (since he was a biologist in R6) and he is smart, hard-working, and passionate about wildlife, including mule deer. You may disagree with him about how to get from point A to point B, but I’ve never heard him not acknowledge that mule deer numbers are down.
Out of all the things (some which actually is drivel) coming out of FWP, not sure why you would pick a synopsis that is common-flipping knowledge backed up by decades of research by mule deer/ungulate biologists to take issue with (unless reading research paper summaries and facts that are relevant to what’s going on with mule deer in MT and across the west is somehow wrong enough to make you feel “dumber for having looked at it”).
There’s plenty you, we, I can disagree with about what FWP does but it does seem ridiculous to me how easily every. little. thing. that they put out gets proverbially black-balled here.
And by all means, disagree away with your public servants; it’s part of their jobs, but the personal attacks and jabs against FWP bios and managers are unnecessary. They deal with enough other BS already.