Just a though. probably my all time favorite hunting rifle was a 660 Remington in 308. Stock was factory and sotra looked like a fence post but the rifle handled really really well. Had a 20" barrel and a fixed 2 3/4x Redfield on it, my son has it now. Something about that rifle that I think really contributed to it's handling was the barrel was heavier than a standard barrel. Here at the house right now so got it out for a look. At the muzzle the barrel is .585". In contrast my 308 partiot is .605 at 22". And maybe the biggest plus for nice handling was the 2 3/4x fixed Redfield. My son didn't like the scope so took it off and gave it back and put a 2-7x scope on it, just doesn't feel the same to me! I have a Mod 70 Feather weight in 6.5x55 with a 22" barrel that measures .540" at the muzzle and it's a really nice handling rifle. I have a Leupold/Redfield 2-7x on it which is really nice but I just wonder if the 2 3/4x might not have improved it? Not a clue. I think a good part of the weighjt thing is how the rifle balances between your hands and the 660 is a real sweetheart, the mod 70 ain't no slouch either though. Have a 788 in 308 with an 18" barrel and just don't excite me and I loved the ole 788"s. I think it's the barrel that turns me off. Had a Rem mod 7 when it first came out and loved it,,,till I shot it. Thing didn't group well with anything. had a really thin barrel and think that had something to do with it. Beautiful rifle though!