Also still waiting for the wolves to fix the foot rot at the Elk Refuge. They’ve had several decades now…I want my money back.
It is unfortunate that you either chose not to, or actually were unable to example two of the most important qualities of a person trained in science.
One is the ability apply critical thinking and observe situations, in this case two environmental equations that involved elk, a disease of elk and wolves and then separate out and compare the variable factors.
On the one hand we had a disease in an animal population, hoof rot in elk at the Jackson Hole Elk feeding grounds, that has been firmly established for two decades, is present in large numbers in a herd of maybe thousands, and has an unstoppable method of disease transfer.
The elk at the feeding grounds live in barnyard conditions, packed standing together in mud, feces and urine.
Any type of bio remediation by wolves there would be pure fantasy.
In the other wildlife equation, SE Washington and NE Oregon, we have an established predator guild, and a disease, elk hoof rot, just coming into the area with very few cases, a hand full really. Barring trails there are no places where elk could gather in the same numbers in a place of ideal disease transfer.
The situation in SE Washington and NE Oregon is an exact match for possible wolf bio remediation of elk hoof rot,,,,there,,,just there,,, as it matches the formula offered by a cutting edge wildlife biologist whose specially is wildlife diseases.
Yet you could not even see any of that potential for bio-mediation via selective predation of infected elk, just like most of those who responded.
They are simply not trained in science to see and separate variables and evaluate them But you are and you just lumped two very different wildlife situations together as equals, which they most certainly are not.