Justabirdwatcher
Well-known member
Not really an odd question when you consider what you wrote -Odd question. For it, obviously. Agree with you completely. But political compromise is dead, especially when one party has complete control. This part of the reason neither side wants to kill the filibuster.
"Being in the middle means compromise, which leads to imperfect solutions to complex problems, which leads to more fuel for social media to overemphasize the problem.....You see it on HT with some people being "Not one acre!" regarding public lands. That is an oversimplification that might fit on a t-shirt but might end up blocking progress that actually may be net positive."
In one breath, you seem to say compromise leads to more problems, and in the next you say that uncompromising positions block progress.
Feel free to explain. Not trying to "get you" but rather understand what you meant. When I first read it, it appeared as though you contradicted yourself.