Hunting Leases/Kids Hunting/Drury Syndrome

Idk if they are the ones calling for eliminating deer when it shows up...
No disagreement there whatsoever. Just pointing out that it’s kind of ironic when the states, who in some cases instituted the antler restrictions, start efforts to reduce herd numbers, often targeting mature bucks.

Just my opinion, but when middle schoolers are shaming a classmate over what their first buck scored, we’re well past having a problem. And that’s where this has gone in a lot of places.
 
Nothing makes my stomach churn like the term “hit list.”

Around me, unless you shoot a truly giant buck, you’ll have neighbors whining about killing little deer. And if you do shoot a giant they’ll wine because it was on their hit list.

I’ve mostly quit deer hunting myself here. I’ve shut down my trail cameras. I take kids hunting instead, and encourage them to shoot whatever they want. I won’t allow deer size to even enter the conversation. If a small buck is shot, I proudly send photos to the neighbors. It makes me smile.
 
Just my opinion, but when middle schoolers are shaming a classmate over what their first buck scored, we’re well past having a problem. And that’s where this has gone in a lot of places.
Wow, never even occurred to me this is happening. I'm sure it is. Times really have changed. I'm only 37. This thread gives me a lot to think on, generally regarded the QDMA as a net positive on hunting but good post above illustrating the outcomes. I don't have kids, but me and most of my friends first deer were all button bucks. It was such an exciting time. I was actually in high school, 15, remember classmates asking me what it was and responding "just a button buck" and getting "hey, that's cool, that's what my first deer was too!" excitement back. I think the QDMA stuff came on the scene heavy around me as I was transitioning stages of hunting in and after college as I picked up bow hunting and naturally seeking more mature/bigger bucks so never occurred to me what has been discussed on here or looking at it from the perspective of new and young hunters.

I think the OP has his head on straight. At the end of the day it should be about the hunting, not the antlers.
 
Which state did that? Southern?
Tennessee. The epicenter of CWD in the western part of the state was in an area with several large (by TN standards) landowners who had been on long term QDM programs plus an 18K acre club that was trophy managed for many years. Despite years of liberal state regulations on doe harvest and a two buck limit, the overall deer herd was large and healthy, with a high population of older age class deer because a lot of landowners and clubs were practicing their own management standards. Arguably some of the best hunting in the state. CWD prevalence, just 7 years after discovery is now said to be north of 60% in 3.5 yo+ bucks in the defined epicenter. The once 18K acre (theyve lost some acreage recently) club that had a 125” or 4.5 yo minimum restriction on bucks for many years has been essentially open harvest the past few seasons, has just a fraction of their members base and is killing at best a handful of mature deer. I have friends with property in the area and the deer are basically nonexistent and mature bucks few and far between - and the ones left are hunted by several people. I grew up in this area and watched the evolution and the only term I can describe it as is sad. Sad first and foremost for the deer, but also the hunting community, as the hunting culture is I’m afraid forever changed.

Definitely not interested in a CWD debate but will say to those who claim “they’ve had it for years out west and still have big deer”, they should see what it did there. Guys I know who were some of the most serious mature buck hunters don’t even hunt anymore locally. Heck, I left too.
 
Which state did that? Southern?
Pennsylvania did that. Basically 3 pt on one side and 4 pt on one side areas. Then increase doe license sales by increasing numbers or adding DMAP tags. In some areas it decimated the herd IMO. In others had little affect. It really put it back on the hunters to do the right thing. Which never works IMO. I think the antler restrictions have helped with a bigger older buck population if that's your goal. There is some great bucks coming out of PA right now. Its just at what cost? Would I shoot a spike or fork horn. No. But there is little I would shoot. I would rather take others. Attached is a picture from last year. This buck is roughly 8.5 years old based on deer drive siting's the previous years. I chased him hard with no success. I took a week last year to go after him. I finally got him with in range. At that point in my mind I had finally won and let him walk. I was pretty stoked. This camera is at my stand. 1000005968.jpg
 
It's not just Drury syndrome anymore...it's all people who make money from hunting and videoing it...Randy, Steve R, Drury, Lakosky, Eastman....etc..etc. It's always needs to be bigger, let it grow...blah blah blah...

I find fishing more enjoyable now, but still like to hunt and I'm getting back into bow hunting starting in 2026, but public land only, lost my private spot 3 years ago when the owner died. Some friends just up and quit all hunting due to the pressure and bad run ins, I'll see how that goes.

Shoot what makes you happy....
 
Just my opinion, but when middle schoolers are shaming a classmate over what their first buck scored, we’re well past having a problem. And that’s where this has gone in a lot of places.
I teach 3 or 4 hunters Ed classes every year. Every class some 12 year old will show me a picture of a 130” deer their dad told them they had to pass. I bet most of them end up with tag soup.
 
Nothing makes my stomach churn like the term “hit list.”

Around me, unless you shoot a truly giant buck, you’ll have neighbors whining about killing little deer. And if you do shoot a giant they’ll wine because it was on their hit list.

I’ve mostly quit deer hunting myself here. I’ve shut down my trail cameras. I take kids hunting instead, and encourage them to shoot whatever they want. I won’t allow deer size to even enter the conversation. If a small buck is shot, I proudly send photos to the neighbors. It makes me smile.
You know what I do now? I don't ask the neighbors what they killed and I don't tell them what I take off my land. Ignorance is bliss. The deer I shoot are hung where they can't see them, and I no longer share pictures on any social media.
 
You know what I do now? I don't ask the neighbors what they killed and I don't tell them what I take off my land. Ignorance is bliss. The deer I shoot are hung where they can't see them, and I no longer share pictures on any social media.
We’re all on good terms. It’s kind of like any hunting camp, we just hunt different properties. I genuinely enjoy sharing in their successes when I get photos from them.

The other benefit is that we’re in touch with each other all year, so when we have sightings of rare critters like a fisher, bobcat, or badger, it’s fun to let everyone know.

My post sounded kind of harsh, and I didn’t mean for it to come across that way. I’m surrounded by mostly great people. Texts are more along the lines of a good-natured ribbing than a middle finger.
 
The older set have forgot their roots with all this high dollar antler farming. The majority of trophy hunters wouldn't be hunter if they started out in a hit list environment.

Now we are starting to see that coddling bucks, having them feed out the same trough of buck nuggets and then disperse is a major vector of disease. Antler lust is the downfall of deer management.
 
Leasing land here in the southeast is becoming ridiculous. I have seen it go from asking for access, to leasing affordably, to losing leases due to agents and websites getting farmers up to $20-30 an acre. All this for killing 120-130 inch bucks. Not to mention the land is being sold off and bought up by out of staters. Deer hunting in the southeast for the average person will become nonexistent in the next 20 years. I said screw it and bought my own land just to ensure my boys will always have a place.
 
Leasing land here in the southeast is becoming ridiculous. I have seen it go from asking for access, to leasing affordably, to losing leases due to agents and websites getting farmers up to $20-30 an acre. All this for killing 120-130 inch bucks. Not to mention the land is being sold off and bought up by out of staters. Deer hunting in the southeast for the average person will become nonexistent in the next 20 years. I said screw it and bought my own land just to ensure my boys will always have a place.
$60 to $80 here ive heard some pieces are at $100.
 
Said it before and will say it again for those in the back of the room. The QDM movement has done more to take away Access, Opportunity and arguably Recruitment than a lot of the other points we debate on this forum.
That’s been my position for about a decade. The antler obsession and hunting popularity has made access unlikely for those without luck or deep pockets.
 
In my county and the neighboring one, there are literally zero acres of huntable public land for deer. The local deer club system is essentially the only option. I can think of eight to ten groups that have access to ranches and run organized canyon drives. That model isn’t what it was in the 1980s and 1990s, largely because more large ranches are now owned by urban landowners, and fewer club members are actively involved in production agriculture. As a result, the old quid pro quo land-access relationships have largely disappeared. Hunting here is viewed as a privilege, not a right.


Antler restrictions within the clubs are generally moderate, and there are a few big-buck contests that are consistently won by hunters with exclusive access. Since there are no doe tags, kids often get some leeway on smaller bucks. Most people genuinely want young hunters to succeed, and many kids from the ag community still learn to hunt alongside an older mentor.


What really stands out to me, though, is that opportunity and community are the primary focus of these clubs. Evenings often turn into a circuit, with members visiting neighboring clubs for drinks and grilling. In many ways, it’s an eight-week-long social season. Reciprocity extends well beyond deer, with invitations for turkey, duck, or pig hunts commonly exchanged.


Because the state allows two deer tags, this OTC, unlimited region often serves as a second tag, while the first is used to apply for a trophy area hundreds of miles away. There isn’t much pressure locally to kill a “booner.” In the right situation, I think there’s an opportunity to appeal to landowners for population control rather than trophy hunting. The challenge is that a couple of guys stand-hunting create far less disturbance than twenty hunters marching through woods and fields. It’s easy to understand why a landowner might prefer one hunter paying $10,000, whose truck is rarely seen at the gate and who spends most daylight hours quietly in a stand.


I also have the unique privilege of sitting on a deer stand and seeing the Golden Gate Bridge in the distance. Pretty cool for California, huh?
 
How do we engage the next generation of hunters if they cant shoot 99% of the bucks they see and cant commit the time often needed to try and get lucky enough to harvest something on the hit list.
Its an interesting question, but one that im starting to think has a bitter answer. Most kids just wont care. For some its too cold, some its too buggy. Some dont like to sit and be quiet, some dont like to have to follow a landowners management plan. Access and harvest restrictions are like winter kill for hunter recruitment, which (to me) isnt always a bad thing, but is like the great bottleneck that helps keep game populations, age structure, and hunter pressure balanced. As for how to keep kids excited? Take them out there and let them dome some nanny does and if that dont light your fire your woods wet.
 
For some its too cold, some its too buggy. Some dont like to sit and be quiet,
As kids definitely. I can think of quite a few kids I went to school with that had absolutely zero interest in hunting but since have become very involved in hunting. I get a laugh whenever I see them and they're trying to tell me how much they like hunting. Like yah I know ive been doing it my whole life. Like back you guys thought it was dumb before it was endorsed by every god awful "country" singing hack.
 
As kids definitely. I can think of quite a few kids I went to school with that had absolutely zero interest in hunting but since have become very involved in hunting. I get a laugh whenever I see them and they're trying to tell me how much they like hunting. Like yah I know ive been doing it my whole life. Like back you guys thought it was dumb before it was endorsed by every god awful "country" singing hack.
Lord a mighty say it again brother
 
this is hilarious in a way. The old school deer hunting connoisseur wants to says wow, thats an awesome story. Beautiful deer too. One day I'd live to hunt the forests of Pennsylvania".

But then LeRoy jumps in the conversation and wants to say "THAT BUCKS A FRICKIN TOAD SON LOOK AT THE GUT ON HIM I BET HES A HUNNERT YEARS OLD IN BUCK YEARS"
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
117,822
Messages
2,170,406
Members
38,361
Latest member
Lionelshort
Back
Top