Dept of Interior Looking To Sell Public Lands

I'm not surprised at this point. Thanks for sharing. I guess I get to write my Senators again.
 
We’ll see if the “wait to see how this plays out” crowd has an opinion. The good news is that state and local governments don’t have any money to purchase these lands at fair market value.
 
Who said anything about fair market value? It just says opportunity.

Rules for you and me, not for thee.
Good point. I forgot about level of stupidity in this Admin. There are laws on the books that land has to be sold at FMV. Congress should just make a statement that every transaction will be investigated with a high probability of reversal.

The pattern is clear- do as much damage as fast as possible.
 
Beyond land sales, there will be an acceleration of industry "partnerships." If the recent track record of "partnerships" is an indicator, a lot of private enterprises will get sweetheart deals on public land and quasi-ownership of public resources on those lands, with the US taxpayer getting almost nothing, or in the case of hard rick minerals, the US taxpayer gets absolutely nothing. That's hardly a partnership. That's corporate/industry welfare.

I've not seen a more "socialist" effort in the last ten years than how industry, often foreign-owned, gets public resources for almost nothing. How they get to avoid many of the costs of doing business. How they get to lower their bonding risk. How they get to socialize many of the long-term liabilities. That's socialism in action, not the theoretical possibilities I've been warned about.

The apologists will be out in force, trying to rationalize this strategic plan. Just look at the dark room deals that have been made for data centers. We're supposed to believe that DOI will use competition and markets to decide who, what, where, and at what return to the US taxpayer.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
120,456
Messages
2,260,440
Members
39,138
Latest member
Todd R
Back
Top