CWD Confirmed in California Deer Population

FI460

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 22, 2018
Messages
1,502
Location
Ashland, OR
Saw this the other day. It only makes sense that it’s been on the landscape since forever then.
It would not surprise me to learn that there were some random sporadic cases that pop up in cervid species here and there. But keep in mind that there has not been a single sporadic case found in deer or elk to date. These cases in California are the first found in over 20 years of testing.
 
It would not surprise me to learn that there were some random sporadic cases that pop up in cervid species here and there. But keep in mind that there has not been a single sporadic case found in deer or elk to date. These cases in California are the first found in over 20 years of testing.
Can you elaborate on that?
 
Can you elaborate on that?
With sheep there was 2 different kinds of scrapie, "classical" and "atypical". The atypical is a sporadic or spontaneous form of this disease. Meaning there is no infection source (that we know of) so to speak, it just sporadically appears in the sheep population. Atypical scrapie also manifests itself differently in the individual animal. That is to say that the prions collect in different areas of the body at different densities, meaning sometimes they elude testing. These animals weren't shedding nearly as many infectious prions through saliva, urine, feces. edit: there's still some debate about how contagious atypical scrapie is, but it's likely not as contagious as classical scrapie.

This spontaneous form of a TSE is also the most popular type of Creutzfeldt-Jakobs Disease, or "sporadic CJD", in humans. Where we see a few hundred cases every year, globally.

I believe they've found two moose in Europe that they believe had a sporadic form of CWD. But there's still some debate out there about what that means in cervids and whether or not they can confirm this as "sporadic". I believe these would be the first two cervids, globally, that potentially had this sporadic form of the disease.

Some noteworthy context to this discussion. There is a difference between what's being proposed with this genetic program in sheep and deer. They've been able to drastically reduce scrapie in domestic sheep using the same selective breeding for heritable traits strategy that the article above talks about. This work in white tailed deer is work done by a number of scientists, but Dr. Chris Seabury is the most notable. However, in sheep they found a phenotype that was basically completely resistant to scrapie. That is not the case with deer, only less susceptible phenotypes. They still get positives once in a while in sheep. And when they do, they cull the heard and pay the owner indemnity money. How is that going to be possible with a wild deer herd?


Some research on the topic of scrapie:
By Justin Greenlee

Transmission characteristics

Overview
 
Last edited:
So do you think it just showed up recently in CA? How? Naturally or transported carcass from out of state?

I used to live and hunt in the sierras and the coast. F&G only ask the last two years for samples only out of DZones. Never was asked in the early to later 2000s. No friends of family have ever test their bucks in CA and hunt all over. I’d be curious how many samples they get yearly and since when exactly.

Also keep in mind, CA DFG puts deer at the very bottom of their list of concerns/resources. Its marine life, predators, threatened species, endangered, cannabis, field mice, then maybe deer if they have some pennies left over. They are so hamstrung by groups like Center for Biological diversity.
 
So do you think it just showed up recently in CA? How? Naturally or transported carcass from out of state?

I used to live and hunt in the sierras and the coast. F&G only ask the last two years for samples only out of DZones. Never was asked in the early to later 2000s. No friends of family have ever test their bucks in CA and hunt all over. I’d be curious how many samples they get yearly and since when exactly.

Also keep in mind, CA DFG puts deer at the very bottom of their list of concerns/resources. Its marine life, predators, threatened species, endangered, cannabis, field mice, then maybe deer if they have some pennies left over. They are so hamstrung by groups like Center for Biological diversity.
California has tested over 6000 animals since the early 2000s IIRC. Don't quote me on that.

But to your question, I can't say for sure. Could have been infectious material transported to CA by other vectors. For example humans could've dumped a positive carcass from another state near this location. Could've been that positive deer have escaped detection in Nevada and the disease has migrated into CA. I'd say it's unlikely both of these positives are sporadic cases.

But again, my understanding is that if there was a sporadic case in deer, there is a potential that prions would not accumulate in the lymph nodes, and therefore would go undetected by the standard testing procedures being used by hunters and state agencies where laryngeal lymph nodes are the standard testing material.
 
So do you think it just showed up recently in CA? How? Naturally or transported carcass from out of state?

I used to live and hunt in the sierras and the coast. F&G only ask the last two years for samples only out of DZones. Never was asked in the early to later 2000s. No friends of family have ever test their bucks in CA and hunt all over. I’d be curious how many samples they get yearly and since when exactly.

Also keep in mind, CA DFG puts deer at the very bottom of their list of concerns/resources. Its marine life, predators, threatened species, endangered, cannabis, field mice, then maybe deer if they have some pennies left over. They are so hamstrung by groups like Center for Biological diversity.

 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
111,397
Messages
1,957,346
Members
35,156
Latest member
Bmor19534
Back
Top