Constitutional Question

TLC

Active member
Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
1,491
Location
illinois
OK, have looked but can't find an answer to this question. anyone have an answer?

what takes precedence in free speech? the constitution? or a seperate "Terms of Use" agreement? have some idiots getting out of hand on another board with comments about assination, major racial slurs that embarassed me, and other out of line comments.

these people have been told to stop, or get banned from the site. they are talking about a lawsuit if they get banned for violating their freedom of speech rights.

anyone have an answer or opinion?
 
The Constitution only restricts what the gooberment can and can't do. You as a private party cannot be sued for violation of someone's constitutional rights. There are civil suits that can be raised, but you have warned them to tone down the crap and they still refuse. Who are they commenting on assassinating? Heck, talking about assassinating someone could be seen as conspiracy to commit murder. If they are talking about Obamessiah then just turn the SS onto them.
 
wyomingtim, this is the post that I am refering to. the second one is the talk about shooting obama.

Hello members,

Some of you have been warned about your language and the use of racial slurs on the forums. No more warning will be given! Any future racial stereotyping and/or name calling will result in an immediate and permanent ban.



No doubt the outcome of the elections yesterday creates the potential for difficult times ahead for hunting privileges and gun ownership rights in America. But to win the battles ahead, we can not present ourselves as the lunatic fringe. If the perception is created that “all” hunters engage in racial slurs, profane language, and the like, we’ll forever alienate the majority of America who we must bring into our camp. Remember, only about 10% of Americans are hunters. Another 10% are the whacked out animal rights types. It’s the 80% in the middle who will decide our future! If we turn them against us – our goose is cooked.



Look, the NAHC is a club full of great ambassadors to the hunting and outdoors community. We actively inform our members of legislative news in every issue of the magazine as well as with frequent news items on the web site. Having those messages undermined by posters using racial slurs as their point of emphasis is not doing anyone any favors.



The most recent issue of North American Hunter covered the hunter’s reasons for supporting the McCain/Palin ticket. If you would like to continue debating each side’s policies, please do so on their merits, and not the color of their skin. If you can not manage to make your point without using such language, take your opinions else where. This includes the more alarming discussions some folks have participated in regarding assassination attempts on any politician. I think we can all agree that that sort of rhetoric will only play into a stronger case for stricter gun control laws as opposed to promoting our hunting heritage. Anyone who thinks this is a good idea … we don’t want as part of the NAHC anyway.



We owe it to the NAHC Membership and to America’s heritage to closely monitor and filter these forums. We can’t allow what’s posted here to damage our cause in the long run even more than the new political landscape might!



Be responsible with what you say on the forums; if things get heated, stop, take a breath, and think before you respond. You can’t take back things as easily once they are posted to a forum.



Thank you!



NAHC


Obama at 100 yards. Never mind. If I finish that sentence I'll be banned for 5 lifetimes.

Brian




Back to top


Gobble Gobble Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 1:39 PM

Joined: 9/19/2007
Posts: 139


Is too close for comfort.
God Bless, Scott

Back to top


winchestergrizzlybear Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 1:45 PM

Joined: 9/21/2007
Posts: 1360


which way is the wind blowing? what kind of weapon?


































+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Eph. 2:8&9 For by Grace are you saved through Faith;and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast. NRA Life Member since 2000 NAHC Life Member since 2001

Back to top


obxman58 Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:44 PM

Joined: 9/27/2007
Posts: 657


nah,it will be 800-1000 yards like the video i saw recently of guys hitting speeedgoats with the first shot.










LM since 1995,NRA,Sons of Confederate Veterans.Colorado Springs,Colorado.

Back to top


strtarrow Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 6:09 PM

Joined: 5/19/2008
Posts: 920


10-4, 100 yards is way too close.






Many of us lost the battle but let us not lose sight of the wars end. Mike LM

Back to top


elkman1 Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 6:36 PM

Joined: 11/15/2007
Posts: 264


ok ok...First off, it's been good knowing ya'll. So here it goes...

475 yards with wind at you back. Weapon - Your Choice.



Brian


NAHC/NRA/DU Life Member Hunters Helping Hunters www.hhh-usa.org Help get kids into the outdoors www.traps4kids.com

Back to top


elkman1 Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 6:38 PM

Joined: 11/15/2007
Posts: 264


By the way, that little line above the B in my name is a picture showing about how big he'd be at that distance.

Brian


NAHC/NRA/DU Life Member Hunters Helping Hunters www.hhh-usa.org Help get kids into the outdoors www.traps4kids.com

Back to top


strtarrow Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 6:41 PM

Joined: 5/19/2008
Posts: 920


I could easily do a head shot with my 243 under those conditions. I agree, been good knowing most of you. Then there is dingus, trout and diana just to name a few. Commie bastards!!!!!!






Many of us lost the battle but let us not lose sight of the wars end. Mike LM

Back to top


winchestergrizzlybear Posted: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:24 PM

Joined: 9/21/2007
Posts: 1360


At that distance with my .270 Winchester, I could put 2 to 3 shots center mass, before it hit the ground!
 
heres what got the ball rolling.

I just got a letter from the powers that be in charge of the NAHC.

That I cannot use the N word!

OR I will be banned permanently from the site!

What ever happened to Freedom of Speech!?!?

I guess the trained monkey is already wielding his powers to be, over the NAHC!!!!

I guess the NAHC is bought and paid for by the Democratic party and the Socialist in Charge, Barack Hussein Obama!!!!

How pathetic, that a hunting site such as this, wants to limit our Freedoms!

Watch out boys, the Democrats are just getting started, what is next on their agenda, to limit our Freedoms? I wonder what other words they will want us NOT to say?





Here is a copy of the letter that they sent me, along with my response to them:



First of all let me tell you that I am not Politically Correct, nor will I ever be! You want to take away my Freedom of Speech? Well, you can kiss my ass!!! Tell me did the trained monkey and his democratic party have anything to do with your decision? You are pathetic!!! You want to trample my Freedom of Speech, because you are politically correct!!!! Well, you go right ahead, and ban me, this time I will get my Lawyer. The last time you banned me, I screwed up, and I admitted it! but, this time if you ban me, I will get my Lawyer, I have already made a copy of your letter you sent me and shown it to my lawyer, he told me, lets wait and see if they do it. Then we will go after them! So, PLEASE ban me!!!! My lawyer is just waiting to see what you cowards do!!!! Give me a reason to file a law suit against you guys for limitting my Freedom of Speech!!! Go ahead, make my day! Sincerely, John From: HuntingClub.comSent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:16 AMSubject: Watch what you say...John, Refrain from using the N word, or any variations of it or you will be banned for good. You are free to debate your political views, but that sort of stuff is intolerable. No further warnings will be given out. NAHC
 
OK, have looked but can't find an answer to this question. anyone have an answer?

what takes precedence in free speech? the constitution? or a seperate "Terms of Use" agreement? have some idiots getting out of hand on another board with comments about assination, major racial slurs that embarassed me, and other out of line comments.

these people have been told to stop, or get banned from the site. they are talking about a lawsuit if they get banned for violating their freedom of speech rights.

anyone have an answer or opinion?

Heres the deal the admins/owners on the other site are just pussies,
let them take you to court cause it would be funner than shit to goto court with nutjobs form the internet. dude If I dont get 2-5 lawsuits a year from websites then I start to feel guilty. I have gotten lawyer letters to I just spell out FU in ig bold print and mail it back of course signed by me to make it legal.

On a real site were the admins arent pussies they basically are dictators. They own the site the run the site they can do anything they want with the site.

Hey its been boring lately have them sign the site over to me for a while I will clean up there shit and I love to f with lawyers and idiots.


Fake edit: Oh its the NHAC site, there a bunch of wackjobs anyway and have a ton of wannabe Christan extremes as members who really cares, tell them they will get sued if the dont let there members post what they want. HAHAHAHA
 
DelW, thanks. thats what I've been telling them. nothing they can sue over since they agreed to the "rules" the website imposes when you log onto the site. thanks for the input. and you hit the nail on the head with the christian comment. hell, look at the signature lines of some of them. again, thanks.
 
Dont worry about the rules. I dont even spell them out on my sites, basically cause I dont care. rules on a site are for again pussies who need them.....

I was reading the rest of your posts after I responded, some real true americans there. LOL. I couldnt even be around people like that,
 
That guys talking out his arse, I agree with Del let him sue, then file a countersuit for attorney's fees. Dumbshits should not get away scot free. I love jackasses that think because they have a thought, and vomit it out their piehole that makes it so.
 
You don't have anything to worry about. They are just trying to bully their way through. Like I said before....they can get in trouble for talk like that. Just make a copy of the posts and call the friendly neighborhood FBI. They will pass it on to the SS. They will make life hell for those guys. No matter how unrealistic the threat is, when yuo threaten a President then you will have to answer.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
111,145
Messages
1,948,685
Members
35,050
Latest member
tzog
Back
Top