Changes to MT Upland Season - Resident Priority Takes Effect This Year

[otter82]

The delay for NR was the best decision the commission has made in a while. It was bliss for 10 days, was able to get my kids out with little pressure. Listening to podcasts gripe about lack of birds, it is just all very interesting to hear. For my family, congrat's to the people who put this new season into the regulations. Now lets work on getting bird training season pushed back. I'll be at the commission meetings, letting my voice be heard.

 

[Forkyfinder]

The delay for NR was the best decision the commission has made in a while. It was bliss for 10 days, was able to get my kids out with little pressure. Listening to podcasts gripe about lack of birds, it is just all very interesting to hear. For my family, congrat's to the people who put this new season into the regulations. Now lets work on getting bird training season pushed back. I'll be at the commission meetings, letting my voice be heard.

Think of the benefit for big game hunting

 

[otter82]

Think of the benefit for big game hunting

It would be the single best thing the commission could do. The NR who put in will continue to put in, I doubt we would see any loss of revenue. That would be incredible for the Residents of Montana.

 

[sclancy27]

It would be the single best thing the commission could do. The NR who put in will continue to put in, I doubt we would see any loss of revenue. That would be incredible for the Residents of Montana.

The Commission can't won't do it. It would have to be legislative action.

 

[otter82]

The Commission can't do it. It would have to be legislative action.

The commission can't set seasons?

 

[sclancy27]

They can, but there is a reason the upland bird 10-day went through the legislature. I meant to say, they won't.

The only reason that the NR 10-day passed is that most (I would assume almost all) upland bird outfitting occurs on private land, so it had no effect on their business. A 10-day for NR big game would have an effect on some outfitters (particularly in the west I would think), so I doubt it would even get to a bill. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, I'm saying it's more or less a hopeless idea, at least in my mind.

 

[otter82]

In my opinion the average DYI Montana Resident hunter isn't upset about the outfitter hunting on their favorite Public Land parcel. Maybe the compromise is give the NR who hunt with a licensed outfitter the same start end dates as MT Residents. No change. That should keep the outfitters happy, and keep revenue coming into the state.

They can, but there is a reason the upland bird 10-day went through the legislature. I meant to say, they won't.

The only reason that the NR 10-day passed is that most (I would assume almost all) upland bird outfitting occurs on private land, so it had no effect on their business. A 10-day for NR big game would have an effect on some outfitters (particularly in the west I would think), so I doubt it would even get to a bill. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, I'm saying it's more or less a hopeless idea, at least in my mind.

 

[sclancy27]

In my opinion the average DYI Montana Resident hunter isn't upset about the outfitter hunting on their favorite Public Land parcel. Maybe the compromise is give the NR who hunt with a licensed outfitter the same start end dates as MT Residents. No change. That should keep the outfitters happy, and keep revenue coming into the state.

I don't think the average resident cares either, but the commission sure as hell does and the legislature prob does, albeit less. It sounds like you have an idea, get some people to sign on and bring it to the Commission or Legislature. The legislature would be the quicker avenue, they meet here soon.