Another rifle I want but don't need. The .264 Win Mag.

My dad still shoots his Pre '64 .264 Win Mag with a 26" barrel....

It's killed a pile of CA blacktails, and a few Elk too.

daddog-jpg.245820


He just turned 83... He's got a Wyoming Antelope, California Mule deer and Alberta Mule Deer tag this Fall....The Model 70 will be there for them all....
Sounds like he's found his do all cartridge! great pic btw.
 
The .264WM kicks a$$. While a M70 is the holy grail, mine is a Blaser R8. Crushed mountain goat and musk ox with 140g Remington core lokt factory loads before settling on a load using 142g Accubond LR and a pile of 7828 to take Muley, Stika, and WT deer along with a desert sheep. Western cartridge of any century…I do enjoy it.


IMG_3242.jpeg


IMG_5863.jpeg
 
The .264WM kicks a$$. While a M70 is the holy grail, mine is a Blaser R8. Crushed mountain goat and musk ox with 140g Remington core lokt factory loads before settling on a load using 142g Accubond LR and a pile of 7828 to take Muley, Stika, and WT deer along with a desert sheep. Western cartridge of any century…I do enjoy it.


View attachment 378558


View attachment 378559
Those are beautiful pictures!
 
I have a buddy due to age is getting rid of several rifles. One of which is a very nice Winchester M70 in 264 Win Mag. I have always had a soft spot for that cartridge and who doesn't have a soft spot for a old Winchester anyway, I digress... Nobody needs a reason to put another one in the safe so I have pretty much sold myself on buying it. Long story short... anybody using one? how do you like it?
Shot my 1st deer with a Winchester M70 Sporter in .264 Win Mag. Still to this day my favorite rifle of all time and use it when I don't use my 7mm Rem Mag. I would buy one in a heart beat especially if you get a good price on it.
 
I think the 264WM got a bad rap in the beginning because of bullets, powder, and barrel twist available. 60 years has turned it into a gem. I was gung-ho to have a 26 Nosler or 6.5-300 WBY when I started this little quest. The more I dove into it, the huge increase in powder was not at all worth it for the slight increase in speed to those behemoths.
 
Pre '64? How accurate? From the web:

2
December 3, 2012 - 9:37 am
sp_Permalink
sp_Print
sp_QuotePost

After 40+ years of fooling with Pre-64 M70s I’ve learned a few things about performance of these rifles. Your problems with 264 Fwts are not unusual. This style/caliber is the only one in my experience that pretty consistently performs poorly. At the end of production, I think many M70s left the factyory without being test fired, something that ALWAYS occurred previously. Prior to 1963 they were all test fired and if they did not perform they did not leave the factory. I have seen other 264 Fwts with oversize bores or loose spots near the muzzle that destroyed accuracy.
Sadly, the last 30,000-40,000 M70s made had quality control problems not seen in earlier years. Thery also had inferior quality wood, machine checkering, mis-aligned proof marks, aluminum floorplates/trigger guards on Standard rifles, etc. They are no where near the quality of the earlier rifles.
Id just pop for a custom 6.5 PRC. Call Travis Stevens at TS Customs. Call it a retirement present. That way you get everything exactly like you want it down to the stock color and cerecoating and the added bonus of excellent accuracy nothing worse than trying to figure out why your rifle cant hit a pie plate at 50 yards. Life is way to short and frustrating to live with a junk rifle
 

Forum statistics

Threads
117,575
Messages
2,161,311
Members
38,275
Latest member
dbscio
Back
Top