ACTION ALERT: CPW Commission vote on fur ban

Keep contacting your state representatives and senators before the Grand Junction meeting. This is a solid response from a D representative, but continued outreach is critical to show lawmakers the depth of public concern and distrust around the current process.

View attachment 403741
McCormick helped kill the anti-hunting bill HB 25- 1258 in committee during the last session.
 
They see blood in the water. Once they got one petition through they will keep sending them. Expect bans on mountain lion and black bear hunting, furbearer harvest next. CBD controls majority 6-seat voting block on the commission now. Pandora’s box is officially open.
I am afraid you are right - Buckle up! It's going to get ugly. We have to be loud and vocal and continue to point out how extreme these groups are and how they operate. They will continue to manipulate the truth and avoid a science based common sense approach to wildlife. These groups and several of the commissioners are the eco-terrorists!
 
Reposting from another forum

For me the near term move is to light up the email inboxes and voicemail of Senators Dylan Roberts-Steamboat and Nick Hinrichsen-Pueblo. They will be the swing votes in the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee.

After the embarrassing debacle at the March 4 Commission. And the following vote against the CPW Director's recommendation and stated will of the voters, the commission voted to accept the fur ban citizen petition. Respectfully request the committee convene an oversight hearing with the Commission Chair Rich Reading and Vice Chair Jay Tutchton to achieve some level of public accountability and regain trust with critical stakeholders such as hunters, anglers, trappers, and livestock producers. Until such a hearing is conducted, request the committee halt confirmation of any CPW Commissioners. Furthermore, express concerns with the appointments of Emerick and Sichko and their ability to represent their statutory constituents and objectively support science-based wildlife management. I suspect both Senators will have plenty of opposition research on both. I believe CPW Commission appointments will begin hearings in committee next week.

Be respectful, I believe both of these Senators to be favorable to sportsmen. If you live in their districts, make sure they know that.

Senator Nick Hinrichsen- 303-866-4878, [email protected], [email protected]

Senator Dylan Roberts- 303-866-4871, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Gonna start working on the beaver bill next.
 
Reposting from another forum

For me the near term move is to light up the email inboxes and voicemail of Senators Dylan Roberts-Steamboat and Nick Hinrichsen-Pueblo. They will be the swing votes in the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee.

After the embarrassing debacle at the March 4 Commission. And the following vote against the CPW Director's recommendation and stated will of the voters, the commission voted to accept the fur ban citizen petition. Respectfully request the committee convene an oversight hearing with the Commission Chair Rich Reading and Vice Chair Jay Tutchton to achieve some level of public accountability and regain trust with critical stakeholders such as hunters, anglers, trappers, and livestock producers. Until such a hearing is conducted, request the committee halt confirmation of any CPW Commissioners. Furthermore, express concerns with the appointments of Emerick and Sichko and their ability to represent their statutory constituents and objectively support science-based wildlife management. I suspect both Senators will have plenty of opposition research on both. I believe CPW Commission appointments will begin hearings in committee next week.

Be respectful, I believe both of these Senators to be favorable to sportsmen. If you live in their districts, make sure they know that.

Senator Nick Hinrichsen- 303-866-4878, [email protected], [email protected]

Senator Dylan Roberts- 303-866-4871, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Gonna start working on the beaver bill next.
Senator Roberts is a friend to CO sportsmen.
 
More press covering the dumpster fire that is the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission…..

 
Some good news, the public land beaver hunting ban is dead for this congressional session. Please send thank you emails to the folks who voted YES to postpone indefinitely.


View attachment 404653
Interesting on the three “Yes” votes. We all knew Rep. Story is in the anti-hunting camp. Total Boulder crazy person. She hosted fundraisers for Samantha Miller and CATS. Kinda surprised by Rep Martinez. Rep Lindsay has established herself in the anti camp too. Had to take a few shots at the sportsmen community, put us in our place publicly.

Lindsay added that “respectfully, it is not just for sportsmen, hunters and anglers to decide animal policy.”

Something to keep an eye on if you live in their district.
 
I thought this was a well-done, thoughtful piece. Way better than the trash that Eric Washburn puts out and the news outlets consistently publish….

 
I thought this was a well-done, thoughtful piece. Way better than the trash that Eric Washburn puts out and the news outlets consistently publish….

The stronger path: Reasonable people can disagree about trapping and the fur trade. But a commission charged with wildlife stewardship has a specific obligation: follow the evidence before departing from it. CPW staff built a detailed roadmap, and it should be implemented, evaluated and refined before the state considers more restrictive measures. If the reforms fall short, the case can be made with data. If they succeed, Colorado will have a management model worth building on.

Colorado has a choice: pursue a symbolic policy that weakens the very system designed to protect furbearers or implement a research-backed plan that improves animal welfare, strengthens accountability and builds the data foundation wildlife management depends on. The Furbearer Stakeholder Report is available on CPW’s website. We urge Coloradans to read it and then ask the Commission to follow the science.
 
Out of state, anti-hunting group Center for Biological Diversity is already campaigning hard to ensure Dr. John Emerick is confirmed on the CPW Commission. Action alert to all their people.

Of note CBD was the petitioner for the fur ban that was accepted on March 4. They also attempted to ban hound hunting in AZ through a citizen petition. Emerick provided the deciding vote (6-4) to accept the fur ban petition at the March 4 meeting. Since the March 4 commission meeting, CBD has launched another citizen petition to require non-lethal deterrents for ranchers making wolf depredation claims and raise the bar for any lethal control. They were also huge contributors to Prop 127- mountain lion hunting ban.

Emerick is critical to CBD maintaining their 6 person voting bloc on the commission and unchallenged control of wildlife management in the Colorado. Expect a continued onslaught of citizen petitions to follow if he is confirmed. I really hope our hunting and fishing aligned groups are rallying the troops to push back.

The point of contention isn’t that Emerick is a respected scientist, because he is. It is the clear ideological agenda and bias he brings with him. He weaponizes “science” to try to diminish harvest opportunity. It’s a trick commonly used by the anti-hunting community and we saw it at the last meeting. If our biologists cannot say with 100% certainty exactly what the population of a said species is, then we should employ the “precautionary principle” and eliminate any harvest. It’s a clear trap with a decided outcome.

 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
118,737
Messages
2,204,437
Members
38,629
Latest member
RipDog
Back
Top